TY - JOUR
T1 - Revisiting the dynamic comprehensive model of self-awareness
T2 - a scoping review and thematic analysis of its impact 20 years later
AU - Toglia, Joan
AU - Goverover, Yael
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors would like to acknowledge and thank Carolina Herrera for her assistance.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - This study aimed to (1) describe the scope of research related to the Dynamic Comprehensive Model of Awareness (DCMA) (Toglia & Kirk, 2000); (2) identify themes and support for key model postulates; and (3) suggest future research directions related to this model. Using PRISMA scoping guidelines, 366 articles were reviewed, and 54 articles met our inclusion criteria. Selected studies were clustered into three themes: (1) the relationship between general and online self-awareness (50%); (2) interventions based on the model (41%); and (3) factors contributing to self-awareness (9%). Most studies were conducted with participants with acquired brain injury (BI) and traumatic BI (68%), most used a cross-sectional design (50%), and most intervention studies utilized a single-subject design (18%), followed by an experimental design (9%). This review provides evidence for the wide application of the DCMA across varying ages and populations. The need for a multidimensional assessment approach is recognized; however, stronger evidence that supports a uniform assessment of online self-awareness is needed. The intervention studies frequently described the importance of direct experience in developing self-awareness; however, few studies compared how intervention methods to influence general versus online self-awareness, or how cognitive capacity, self-efficacy, psychological factors, and context, influence the development of self-awareness.
AB - This study aimed to (1) describe the scope of research related to the Dynamic Comprehensive Model of Awareness (DCMA) (Toglia & Kirk, 2000); (2) identify themes and support for key model postulates; and (3) suggest future research directions related to this model. Using PRISMA scoping guidelines, 366 articles were reviewed, and 54 articles met our inclusion criteria. Selected studies were clustered into three themes: (1) the relationship between general and online self-awareness (50%); (2) interventions based on the model (41%); and (3) factors contributing to self-awareness (9%). Most studies were conducted with participants with acquired brain injury (BI) and traumatic BI (68%), most used a cross-sectional design (50%), and most intervention studies utilized a single-subject design (18%), followed by an experimental design (9%). This review provides evidence for the wide application of the DCMA across varying ages and populations. The need for a multidimensional assessment approach is recognized; however, stronger evidence that supports a uniform assessment of online self-awareness is needed. The intervention studies frequently described the importance of direct experience in developing self-awareness; however, few studies compared how intervention methods to influence general versus online self-awareness, or how cognitive capacity, self-efficacy, psychological factors, and context, influence the development of self-awareness.
KW - Metacognition
KW - anosognosia
KW - brain injury
KW - cognitive impairment
KW - feedback
KW - rehabilitation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85130791406&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85130791406&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/09602011.2022.2075017
DO - 10.1080/09602011.2022.2075017
M3 - Review article
C2 - 35583377
AN - SCOPUS:85130791406
SN - 0960-2011
VL - 32
SP - 1676
EP - 1725
JO - Neuropsychological Rehabilitation
JF - Neuropsychological Rehabilitation
IS - 8
ER -