TY - JOUR
T1 - Risk factors for male-to-female partner psychological abuse
AU - Schumacher, Julie A.
AU - Smith Slep, Amy M.
AU - Heyman, Richard E.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the partnership of the US Air Force Family Advocacy Program and the US Department of Agriculture National Network on Family Resilience (contract CR-4953-545735).
PY - 2001
Y1 - 2001
N2 - We review the risk and protective factors for male-to-female partner psychological abuse. The conclusions that can be drawn from this review were limited by the small body of research. However, it does appear that partner psychological aggression/abuse may be more difficult to predict than partner physical aggression/abuse. In general, socio-economic status (SES) variables do not appear to significantly increase risk. Certain relationship variables, including communication patterns, marital adjustment, and attachment were significantly associated with psychological aggression, with moderate to strong effect sizes. However, these associations are difficult to interpret, because these relationship variables exhibit a high degree of conceptual and operational overlap with the psychological aggression. Two main directions can be derived from this review. First and foremost, definitional issues must be resolved. Given that partner emotional abuse, unlike physical or sexual abuse, is typically conceptualized as requiring a pervasive pattern rather than a single salient action, reliable and valid assessment is exceedingly challenging. Second, once definitional issues are resolved, etiological and intervention models can be developed and tested. This review indicates that men's personality and couple factors would be the most fruitful areas from which to start.
AB - We review the risk and protective factors for male-to-female partner psychological abuse. The conclusions that can be drawn from this review were limited by the small body of research. However, it does appear that partner psychological aggression/abuse may be more difficult to predict than partner physical aggression/abuse. In general, socio-economic status (SES) variables do not appear to significantly increase risk. Certain relationship variables, including communication patterns, marital adjustment, and attachment were significantly associated with psychological aggression, with moderate to strong effect sizes. However, these associations are difficult to interpret, because these relationship variables exhibit a high degree of conceptual and operational overlap with the psychological aggression. Two main directions can be derived from this review. First and foremost, definitional issues must be resolved. Given that partner emotional abuse, unlike physical or sexual abuse, is typically conceptualized as requiring a pervasive pattern rather than a single salient action, reliable and valid assessment is exceedingly challenging. Second, once definitional issues are resolved, etiological and intervention models can be developed and tested. This review indicates that men's personality and couple factors would be the most fruitful areas from which to start.
KW - Abuse
KW - Couple factors
KW - Partner
KW - Personality
KW - Psychological abuse
KW - Risk factors
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035090692&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035090692&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S1359-1789(00)00025-2
DO - 10.1016/S1359-1789(00)00025-2
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:0035090692
SN - 1359-1789
VL - 6
SP - 255
EP - 268
JO - Aggression and Violent Behavior
JF - Aggression and Violent Behavior
IS - 2-3
ER -