TY - JOUR
T1 - Risk Stratification in Older Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction
T2 - Physicians' Perspectives
AU - Feder, Shelli L.
AU - Schulman-Green, Dena
AU - Dodson, John A.
AU - Geda, Mary
AU - Williams, Kathleen
AU - Nanna, Michael G.
AU - Allore, Heather G.
AU - Murphy, Terrence E.
AU - Tinetti, Mary E.
AU - Gill, Thomas M.
AU - Chaudhry, Sarwat I.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2015.
PY - 2016/4/1
Y1 - 2016/4/1
N2 - Objective: Risk stratification models support clinical decision making in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) care. Existing models were developed using data from younger populations, potentially limiting accuracy and relevance in older adults. We describe physician-perceived risk factors, views of existing models, and preferences for future model development in older adults. Method: Qualitative study using semi-structured telephone interviews and the constant comparative method. Results: Twenty-two physicians from 14 institutions completed the interviews. Median age was 37, and median years of clinical experience was 11.5. Perceived predictors included cardiovascular, comorbid, functional, and social risk factors. Physicians viewed models as easy to use, yet neither inclusive of risk factors nor predictive of non-mortality outcomes germane to clinical decision making in older adults. Ideal models included multidimensional risk domains and operational requirements. Discussion: Physicians reported limitations of available risk models when applied to older adults with AMI. New models are needed to guide AMI treatment in this population.
AB - Objective: Risk stratification models support clinical decision making in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) care. Existing models were developed using data from younger populations, potentially limiting accuracy and relevance in older adults. We describe physician-perceived risk factors, views of existing models, and preferences for future model development in older adults. Method: Qualitative study using semi-structured telephone interviews and the constant comparative method. Results: Twenty-two physicians from 14 institutions completed the interviews. Median age was 37, and median years of clinical experience was 11.5. Perceived predictors included cardiovascular, comorbid, functional, and social risk factors. Physicians viewed models as easy to use, yet neither inclusive of risk factors nor predictive of non-mortality outcomes germane to clinical decision making in older adults. Ideal models included multidimensional risk domains and operational requirements. Discussion: Physicians reported limitations of available risk models when applied to older adults with AMI. New models are needed to guide AMI treatment in this population.
KW - acute myocardial infarction
KW - medical decision making
KW - older adult
KW - qualitative methodology
KW - risk stratification models
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84959221157&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84959221157&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/0898264315591005
DO - 10.1177/0898264315591005
M3 - Article
C2 - 26100619
AN - SCOPUS:84959221157
SN - 0898-2643
VL - 28
SP - 387
EP - 402
JO - Journal of Aging and Health
JF - Journal of Aging and Health
IS - 3
ER -