TY - JOUR
T1 - Rule-based and word-level statistics-based processing of language
T2 - insights from neuroscience
AU - Ding, Nai
AU - Melloni, Lucia
AU - Tian, Xing
AU - Poeppel, David
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [31500873 (ND) and 31500914 (XT)]; Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (ND); Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [LR16C090002 (ND)]; the Program of Introducing Talents of Discipline to Universities Base [B16018 (XT)]; Major Projects Program of the Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Commission [15JC1400104 (XT)]; and the US National Institutes of Health grant [NIH R01 DC 05660 (DP)].
Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2017/5/28
Y1 - 2017/5/28
N2 - To flexibly convey meaning, the human language faculty iteratively combines smaller units such as words into larger structures such as phrases based on grammatical principles. During comprehension, however, it remains unclear how the brain encodes the relationship between words and combines them into phrases. One hypothesis is that internal grammatical principles governing language generation are also used to parse the hierarchical syntactic structure of spoken language. An alternative hypothesis suggests, in contrast, that decoding language during comprehension solely relies on statistical relationships between words or strings of words, that is, the N-gram statistics, and no hierarchical linguistic structures are constructed. Here, we briefly review distinctions between rule-based hierarchical models and statistics-based linear string models for comprehension. Recent neurolinguistic studies show that tracking of probabilistic relationships between words is not sufficient to explain cortical encoding of linguistic constituent structure and support the involvement of rule-based processing during language comprehension.
AB - To flexibly convey meaning, the human language faculty iteratively combines smaller units such as words into larger structures such as phrases based on grammatical principles. During comprehension, however, it remains unclear how the brain encodes the relationship between words and combines them into phrases. One hypothesis is that internal grammatical principles governing language generation are also used to parse the hierarchical syntactic structure of spoken language. An alternative hypothesis suggests, in contrast, that decoding language during comprehension solely relies on statistical relationships between words or strings of words, that is, the N-gram statistics, and no hierarchical linguistic structures are constructed. Here, we briefly review distinctions between rule-based hierarchical models and statistics-based linear string models for comprehension. Recent neurolinguistic studies show that tracking of probabilistic relationships between words is not sufficient to explain cortical encoding of linguistic constituent structure and support the involvement of rule-based processing during language comprehension.
KW - Speech
KW - grammar
KW - language
KW - neural oscillations
KW - statistics
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84980603619&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84980603619&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/23273798.2016.1215477
DO - 10.1080/23273798.2016.1215477
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84980603619
SN - 2327-3798
VL - 32
SP - 570
EP - 575
JO - Language, Cognition and Neuroscience
JF - Language, Cognition and Neuroscience
IS - 5
ER -