Sand Face: Humanism after Antihumanism

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Have the critiques of humanism of the 1960s and 1970s buried this idea once and for all? Or is there a way that humanism can absorb some of this antihumanist thinking and thereby renew itself? Drawing on writings of Michel Foucault, Charles Taylor, Friedrich Nietzsche, and Martin Heidegger in order to illuminate artworks by Robert Smithson and Hans Holbein, René Arcilla argues for a revised idea of the human that is rooted not in some authentic, essential identity of ours, but in an unruly language in which we all participate. He suggests that educatively cultivating a society that appreciates the Human language could be the aim of humanism in our time.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)655-664
Number of pages10
JournalEducational Theory
Volume65
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2015

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Sand Face: Humanism after Antihumanism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this