School finance court cases and disparate racial impact: The contribution of statistical analysis in New York

Leanna Stiefel, Amy Ellen Schwartz, Robert Berne, Colin C. Chellman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Although analyses of state school finance systems rarely focus on the distribution of funds to students of different races, the advent of racial discrimination as an issue in school finance court cases may change that situation. In this article, we describe the background, analyses, and results of plaintiffs' testimony regarding racial discrimination in Campaign for Fiscal Equity Inc. v. State of New York. Plaintiffs employed multiple regression and public finance literature to show that New York State's school finance system had a disparate racial impact on New York City students. We review the legal basis for disparate racial impact claims, with particular emphasis on the role of quantitative statistical work, and then describe the model we developed and estimated for the court case. Finally, we discuss the defendants' rebuttal, the Court's decision, and conclude with observations about the role of analysis in judicial decision making in school finance.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)151-173
Number of pages23
JournalEducation and Urban Society
Volume37
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2005

Keywords

  • Discrimination
  • Education
  • Statistical evidence in court cases

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Urban Studies

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'School finance court cases and disparate racial impact: The contribution of statistical analysis in New York'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this