Scope and binding

Anna Szabolcsi

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter


    The first part of this article (Sections 1-5) focuses on the classical notions of scope and binding and their formal foundations. It argues that once their semantic core is properly understood, it can be implemented in various different ways: with or without movement, with or without variables. The second part (Sections 6-12) takes up the empirical issues that have redrawn the map in the past two decades. It turns out that scope is not a primitive. Existential scope and distributive scope have to be distinguished, leaving few if any run-of-the-mill quantifiers. Scope behavior is also not uniform. At least three classes of expressions emerge: indefinites, distributive universals, and counters. Likewise, the bound variable interpretation of pronouns is joined by co-variation with situations. As a result, the classical notions of scope and binding are likely to end up as building blocks in the varied mechanisms at work in "scope phenomena" and "bindingphenomena", and not as self-contained analyses of those phenomena.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Title of host publicationSemantics
    PublisherDe Gruyter
    Number of pages37
    ISBN (Electronic)9783110255072
    ISBN (Print)9783110185232
    StatePublished - Dec 23 2011

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • General Arts and Humanities
    • General Social Sciences


    Dive into the research topics of 'Scope and binding'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this