Screening Colonoscopy Association With Gastrointestinal Toxicity and Quality of Life After Prostate Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy

Jonathan W. Lischalk, Vianca F. Santos, Brianna Vizcaino, Astrid Sanchez, Christopher Mendez, Kathleen Maloney-Lutz, Sam Serouya, Seth R. Blacksburg, Todd Carpenter, Moses Tam, Scott Niglio, William Huang, Samir Taneja, Michael J. Zelefsky, Jonathan A. Haas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: Screening colonoscopies (CS) performed before prostate stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) allow for identifying synchronous malignancies and comorbid gastrointestinal (GI) conditions. Performing these procedures prior to radiation precludes the necessity of post-SBRT pelvic instrumentation, which may lead to severe toxicity and fistulization. We review compliance of CSs, incidence of GI pathology, and the impact of pretreatment CS findings on subsequent physician-reported toxicity and patient-reported quality of life (QoL). Methods and Materials: We reviewed an institutional database of patients treated for prostate cancer with SBRT including toxicity and QoL outcomes. A detailed review of pretreatment CS findings was reviewed including identification of diverticulosis, location of polyp resection, and presence of hemorrhoids. Pretreatment CS findings were then correlated with outcomes following SBRT. Results: Identification of comorbid GI conditions was a common event, with the presence of diverticulosis in 49.5% (n = 100), hemorrhoids in 67% (n = 136), and polyps in 48% (n = 98). More than half of patients with polyps removed had at least 1 removed from the rectosigmoid. Pretreatment CS did not introduce a delay in SBRT start date. Grade 1 toxicity was significantly lower in patients who underwent CS closer to the initiation of SBRT. There was no increased risk of physician-graded toxicity in the presence of diverticulosis, hemorrhoids, or polyps. Patient-reported GI QoL pattern in our screening cohort mimicked that seen in the previously published nonscreened population. There was no overt QoL detriment observed in patients who had GI pathology identified before SBRT. Conclusions: GI pathology identified in our elderly patient population was commonly identified on pretreatment CS. Screening CS may optimize bowel health for patients heading into radiation therapy. Toxicity and QoL for patients with GI pathologies identified on pretreatment CS do not preclude the delivery of prostate SBRT. We advocate for pretreatment CS in patients eligible prior to SBRT.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number101747
JournalAdvances in Radiation Oncology
Volume10
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2025

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Screening Colonoscopy Association With Gastrointestinal Toxicity and Quality of Life After Prostate Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this