TY - JOUR
T1 - Sentence processing selectivity in Broca's area
T2 - evident for structure but not syntactic movement
AU - Rogalsky, Corianne
AU - Almeida, Diogo
AU - Sprouse, Jon
AU - Hickok, Gregory
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by NIH NIDCD [grant number DC03681] (G. H.).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Taylor & Francis.
PY - 2015/11/26
Y1 - 2015/11/26
N2 - The role of Broca’s area in sentence processing is hotly debated. Hypotheses include that Broca’s area supports sentence comprehension via syntax-specific processes, hierarchical structure building, or working memory. Here we adopt a within-subject functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) approach using sentence-level contrasts and non-sentential comparison tasks to address these hypotheses. Standard syntactic movement distance effects were replicated, but no difference was found between movement and non-movement sentences in Broca's area in the group or consistently in the individual subject analyses. Group and individual results both identify Broca's area subregions that are selective for sentence structure. Group, but not individual subject results, suggest shared resources for sentence processing and articulation in Broca's area. We conclude that Broca’s area is not selectively processing syntactic movement, but that subregions are selectively responsive to sentence structure. Our findings reinforce Fedorenko and Kanwishser's call for individual subject analyses in Broca's area, as group findings can obscure selective responses.
AB - The role of Broca’s area in sentence processing is hotly debated. Hypotheses include that Broca’s area supports sentence comprehension via syntax-specific processes, hierarchical structure building, or working memory. Here we adopt a within-subject functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) approach using sentence-level contrasts and non-sentential comparison tasks to address these hypotheses. Standard syntactic movement distance effects were replicated, but no difference was found between movement and non-movement sentences in Broca's area in the group or consistently in the individual subject analyses. Group and individual results both identify Broca's area subregions that are selective for sentence structure. Group, but not individual subject results, suggest shared resources for sentence processing and articulation in Broca's area. We conclude that Broca’s area is not selectively processing syntactic movement, but that subregions are selectively responsive to sentence structure. Our findings reinforce Fedorenko and Kanwishser's call for individual subject analyses in Broca's area, as group findings can obscure selective responses.
KW - Broca's area
KW - fMRI
KW - sentence processing
KW - speech comprehension
KW - syntax
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84947037816&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84947037816&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/23273798.2015.1066831
DO - 10.1080/23273798.2015.1066831
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84947037816
SN - 2327-3798
VL - 30
SP - 1326
EP - 1338
JO - Language, Cognition and Neuroscience
JF - Language, Cognition and Neuroscience
IS - 10
ER -