Shifting Priorities: Participatory Budgeting in New York City is Associated with Increased Investments in Schools, Street and Traffic Improvements, and Public Housing

Carolin Hagelskamp, Rebecca Silliman, Erin B. Godfrey, David Schleifer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In participatory budgeting (PB), residents instead of public officials decide how public money is spent. PB may reveal that residents prioritize different investments than public officials, which could lead to more socially just spending. However, little research has examined whether and how PB shifts spending priorities. This study leverages publicly available records on New York City council districts’ capital project allocations over ten years (2009 through 2018), comparing spending within and across PB and non-PB districts. Multi-level regression models show that, on average, when council districts adopted PB, greater proportions of their discretionary capital budgets were allocated to schools, streets and traffic improvements, and public housing. PB was associated with decreases in spending on parks and recreation projects and housing preservation and development projects. The article shows that priorities shift when residents are directly involved in budgeting. Implications for equity and community well-being, and directions for future research are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-26
Number of pages26
JournalNew Political Science
DOIs
StatePublished - 2020

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Shifting Priorities: Participatory Budgeting in New York City is Associated with Increased Investments in Schools, Street and Traffic Improvements, and Public Housing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this