TY - JOUR
T1 - Smart prediction of liquefaction-induced lateral spreading
AU - Raja, Muhammad Nouman Amjad
AU - Abdoun, Tarek
AU - El-Sekelly, Waleed
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences
PY - 2024/6
Y1 - 2024/6
N2 - The prediction of liquefaction-induced lateral spreading/displacement (Dh) is a challenging task for civil/geotechnical engineers. In this study, a new approach is proposed to predict Dh using gene expression programming (GEP). Based on statistical reasoning, individual models were developed for two topographies: free-face and gently sloping ground. Along with a comparison with conventional approaches for predicting the Dh, four additional regression-based soft computing models, i.e. Gaussian process regression (GPR), relevance vector machine (RVM), sequential minimal optimization regression (SMOR), and M5-tree, were developed and compared with the GEP model. The results indicate that the GEP models predict Dh with less bias, as evidenced by the root mean square error (RMSE) and mean absolute error (MAE) for training (i.e. 1.092 and 0.815; and 0.643 and 0.526) and for testing (i.e. 0.89 and 0.705; and 0.773 and 0.573) in free-face and gently sloping ground topographies, respectively. The overall performance for the free-face topology was ranked as follows: GEP > RVM > M5-tree > GPR > SMOR, with a total score of 40, 32, 24, 15, and 10, respectively. For the gently sloping condition, the performance was ranked as follows: GEP > RVM > GPR > M5-tree > SMOR with a total score of 40, 32, 21, 19, and 8, respectively. Finally, the results of the sensitivity analysis showed that for both free-face and gently sloping ground, the liquefiable layer thickness (T15) was the major parameter with percentage deterioration (%D) value of 99.15 and 90.72, respectively.
AB - The prediction of liquefaction-induced lateral spreading/displacement (Dh) is a challenging task for civil/geotechnical engineers. In this study, a new approach is proposed to predict Dh using gene expression programming (GEP). Based on statistical reasoning, individual models were developed for two topographies: free-face and gently sloping ground. Along with a comparison with conventional approaches for predicting the Dh, four additional regression-based soft computing models, i.e. Gaussian process regression (GPR), relevance vector machine (RVM), sequential minimal optimization regression (SMOR), and M5-tree, were developed and compared with the GEP model. The results indicate that the GEP models predict Dh with less bias, as evidenced by the root mean square error (RMSE) and mean absolute error (MAE) for training (i.e. 1.092 and 0.815; and 0.643 and 0.526) and for testing (i.e. 0.89 and 0.705; and 0.773 and 0.573) in free-face and gently sloping ground topographies, respectively. The overall performance for the free-face topology was ranked as follows: GEP > RVM > M5-tree > GPR > SMOR, with a total score of 40, 32, 24, 15, and 10, respectively. For the gently sloping condition, the performance was ranked as follows: GEP > RVM > GPR > M5-tree > SMOR with a total score of 40, 32, 21, 19, and 8, respectively. Finally, the results of the sensitivity analysis showed that for both free-face and gently sloping ground, the liquefiable layer thickness (T15) was the major parameter with percentage deterioration (%D) value of 99.15 and 90.72, respectively.
KW - Closed-form solution
KW - Feature importance
KW - Gene expression programming (GEP)
KW - Intelligent modeling
KW - Lateral spreading
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85175611357&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85175611357&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jrmge.2023.05.017
DO - 10.1016/j.jrmge.2023.05.017
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85175611357
SN - 1674-7755
VL - 16
SP - 2310
EP - 2325
JO - Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering
JF - Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering
IS - 6
ER -