TY - JOUR
T1 - Some consequences of non-uniform conditions on uniform classes
AU - Yap, Chee K.
N1 - Funding Information:
* This work was sugported in part by NSF Grant MCS 80-05469. ** Present address: Courant Institute of Matheinatical Sciences, 251 Mercer Street. NL’WYork, NY 10012, U.S.A.
PY - 1983/10
Y1 - 1983/10
N2 - We obtain some results of the form: If certain complexity classes satisfy a non-uniform condition, then some unlikely consequences follow. More precisely: 1. (1) If the 'non-uniform polynomial-time hierarchy' collapses at level i>0, i.e., Σi poly = Πi poly, then the Meyer-Stockmeyer hierarchy collapses at level i + 2, i.e., Σi+2 = Πi+2. This strengthens a generalization of a result of Karp and Lipton (1980). 2. (2) If co-NP is conjunctively reducible to a sparse set, then P = NP. This generalizes a theorem of Fortune (1979). 3. (3) If NP is conjunctively and disjunctively reducible to a sparse NP-complete set, then P = NP. This is a partial generalization of a result of Mahaney (1980). Conjuctive and disjunctive reducibility were introduced by Ladner, Lynch and Selman (1975). 4. (4) If co-NP is γ-reducible to a sparse set, then NP = co-NP. γ-reducibility was introduced 5. by Adleman and Manders (1977).
AB - We obtain some results of the form: If certain complexity classes satisfy a non-uniform condition, then some unlikely consequences follow. More precisely: 1. (1) If the 'non-uniform polynomial-time hierarchy' collapses at level i>0, i.e., Σi poly = Πi poly, then the Meyer-Stockmeyer hierarchy collapses at level i + 2, i.e., Σi+2 = Πi+2. This strengthens a generalization of a result of Karp and Lipton (1980). 2. (2) If co-NP is conjunctively reducible to a sparse set, then P = NP. This generalizes a theorem of Fortune (1979). 3. (3) If NP is conjunctively and disjunctively reducible to a sparse NP-complete set, then P = NP. This is a partial generalization of a result of Mahaney (1980). Conjuctive and disjunctive reducibility were introduced by Ladner, Lynch and Selman (1975). 4. (4) If co-NP is γ-reducible to a sparse set, then NP = co-NP. γ-reducibility was introduced 5. by Adleman and Manders (1977).
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0000205276&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0000205276&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/0304-3975(83)90020-8
DO - 10.1016/0304-3975(83)90020-8
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0000205276
SN - 0304-3975
VL - 26
SP - 287
EP - 300
JO - Theoretical Computer Science
JF - Theoretical Computer Science
IS - 3
ER -