TY - JOUR
T1 - Spatial covert attention increases contrast sensitivity across the CSF
T2 - Support for signal enhancement
AU - Carrasco, Marisa
AU - Penpeci-Talgar, Cigdem
AU - Eckstein, Miguel
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was supported by the National Science Foundation (NYI Grant SBR-9528197), a Cattell Fellowship and a Guggenheim Fellowship to MC. We thank Leslie Cameron for her thoughtful contributions to this project, and Yaffa Yeshurun, Karen Frieder, Suleyman Penbeci, Michael Landy and the two anonymous reviewers for comments on a draft of this manuscript.
PY - 2000/6
Y1 - 2000/6
N2 - This study is the first to report the benefits of spatial covert attention on contrast sensitivity in a wide range of spatial frequencies when a target alone was presented in the absence of a local post-mask. We used a peripheral precue (a small circle indicating the target location) to explore the effects of covert spatial attention on contrast sensitivity as assessed by orientation discrimination (Experiments 1-4), detection (Experiments 2 and 3) and localization (Experiment 3) tasks. In all four experiments the target (a Gabor patch ranging in spatial frequency from 0.5 to 10 cpd) was presented alone in one of eight possible locations equidistant from fixation. Contrast sensitivity was consistently higher for peripherally- than for neutrally-cued trials, even though we eliminated variables (distracters, global masks, local masks, and location uncertainty) that are known to contribute to an external noise reduction explanation of attention. When observers were presented with vertical and horizontal Gabor patches an external noise reduction signal detection model accounted for the cueing benefit in a discrimination task (Experiment 1). However, such a model could not account for this benefit when location uncertainty was reduced, either by: (a) Increasing overall performance level (Experiment 2); (b) increasing stimulus contrast to enable fine discriminations of slightly tilted suprathreshold stimuli (Experiment 3); and (c) presenting a local post-mask (Experiment 4). Given that attentional benefits occurred under conditions that exclude all variables predicted by the external noise reduction model, these results support the signal enhancement model of attention. Copyright (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd.
AB - This study is the first to report the benefits of spatial covert attention on contrast sensitivity in a wide range of spatial frequencies when a target alone was presented in the absence of a local post-mask. We used a peripheral precue (a small circle indicating the target location) to explore the effects of covert spatial attention on contrast sensitivity as assessed by orientation discrimination (Experiments 1-4), detection (Experiments 2 and 3) and localization (Experiment 3) tasks. In all four experiments the target (a Gabor patch ranging in spatial frequency from 0.5 to 10 cpd) was presented alone in one of eight possible locations equidistant from fixation. Contrast sensitivity was consistently higher for peripherally- than for neutrally-cued trials, even though we eliminated variables (distracters, global masks, local masks, and location uncertainty) that are known to contribute to an external noise reduction explanation of attention. When observers were presented with vertical and horizontal Gabor patches an external noise reduction signal detection model accounted for the cueing benefit in a discrimination task (Experiment 1). However, such a model could not account for this benefit when location uncertainty was reduced, either by: (a) Increasing overall performance level (Experiment 2); (b) increasing stimulus contrast to enable fine discriminations of slightly tilted suprathreshold stimuli (Experiment 3); and (c) presenting a local post-mask (Experiment 4). Given that attentional benefits occurred under conditions that exclude all variables predicted by the external noise reduction model, these results support the signal enhancement model of attention. Copyright (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd.
KW - Attention mechanisms
KW - Contrast sensitivity
KW - Covert spatial attention
KW - Detection
KW - External noise reduction
KW - Localization
KW - Mask
KW - Orientation discrimination
KW - Peripheral precue
KW - Signal enhancement
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034004666&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034004666&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0042-6989(00)00024-9
DO - 10.1016/S0042-6989(00)00024-9
M3 - Article
C2 - 10788636
AN - SCOPUS:0034004666
SN - 0042-6989
VL - 40
SP - 1203
EP - 1215
JO - Vision research
JF - Vision research
IS - 10-12
ER -