Spatial inequity and national territory: Remapping 1905 in Bengal and Assam

David Ludden

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review


    In 1905, Viceroy Nathaniel Curzon applied well-worn principles of imperial order to reorganize northeastern regions of British India, bringing the entire Meghna-Brahmaputra river basin into one new administrative territory: the province of Eastern Bengal and Assam. He thereby launched modern territorial politics in South Asia by provoking an expansive and ultimately victorious nationalist agitation to unify Bengal and protect India's territorial integrity. This movement and its economic programme (swadeshi) expressed Indian nationalist opposition to imperial inequity. It established a permanent spatial frame for Indian national thought. It also expressed and naturalized spatial inequity inside India, which was increasing at the time under economic globalization. Spatial inequities in the political economy of uneven development have animated territorial politics in South Asia ever since. A century later, another acceleration of globalization is again increasing spatial inequity, again destabilizing territorial order, as nationalists naturalize spatial inequity in national territory and conflicts erupt from the experience of living in disadvantaged places. Remapping 1905 in the long twentieth century which connects these two periods of globalization, spanning eras of empire and nation, reveals spatial dynamics of modernity concealed by national maps and brings to light a transnational history of spatial inequity shared by Bangladesh and Northeast India.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)483-525
    Number of pages43
    JournalModern Asian Studies
    Issue number3
    StatePublished - May 2012

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Geography, Planning and Development
    • History
    • Sociology and Political Science


    Dive into the research topics of 'Spatial inequity and national territory: Remapping 1905 in Bengal and Assam'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this