TY - JOUR
T1 - Speaking rhythmically can shape hearing
AU - Assaneo, M. Florencia
AU - Rimmele, Johanna M.
AU - Sanz Perl, Yonatan
AU - Poeppel, David
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.
PY - 2021/1
Y1 - 2021/1
N2 - Evidence suggests that temporal predictions arising from the motor system can enhance auditory perception. However, in speech perception, we lack evidence of perception being modulated by production. Here we show a behavioural protocol that captures the existence of such auditory–motor interactions. Participants performed a syllable discrimination task immediately after producing periodic syllable sequences. Two speech rates were explored: a ‘natural’ (individually preferred) and a fixed ‘non-natural’ (2 Hz) rate. Using a decoding approach, we show that perceptual performance is modulated by the stimulus phase determined by a participant’s own motor rhythm. Remarkably, for ‘natural’ and ‘non-natural’ rates, this finding is restricted to a subgroup of the population with quantifiable auditory–motor coupling. The observed pattern is compatible with a neural model assuming a bidirectional interaction of auditory and speech motor cortices. Crucially, the model matches the experimental results only if it incorporates individual differences in the strength of the auditory–motor connection.
AB - Evidence suggests that temporal predictions arising from the motor system can enhance auditory perception. However, in speech perception, we lack evidence of perception being modulated by production. Here we show a behavioural protocol that captures the existence of such auditory–motor interactions. Participants performed a syllable discrimination task immediately after producing periodic syllable sequences. Two speech rates were explored: a ‘natural’ (individually preferred) and a fixed ‘non-natural’ (2 Hz) rate. Using a decoding approach, we show that perceptual performance is modulated by the stimulus phase determined by a participant’s own motor rhythm. Remarkably, for ‘natural’ and ‘non-natural’ rates, this finding is restricted to a subgroup of the population with quantifiable auditory–motor coupling. The observed pattern is compatible with a neural model assuming a bidirectional interaction of auditory and speech motor cortices. Crucially, the model matches the experimental results only if it incorporates individual differences in the strength of the auditory–motor connection.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85092349977&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85092349977&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/s41562-020-00962-0
DO - 10.1038/s41562-020-00962-0
M3 - Article
C2 - 33046860
AN - SCOPUS:85092349977
SN - 2397-3374
VL - 5
SP - 71
EP - 82
JO - Nature human behaviour
JF - Nature human behaviour
IS - 1
ER -