TY - JOUR
T1 - Standardizing assessment of spoken discourse in aphasia
T2 - A working group with deliverables
AU - Stark, Brielle C.
AU - Dutta, Manaswita
AU - Murray, Laura L.
AU - Bryant, Lucy
AU - Fromm, Davida
AU - MacWhinney, Brian
AU - Ramage, Amy E.
AU - Roberts, Angela
AU - Den Ouden, Dirk B.
AU - Brock, Kris
AU - McKinney-Bock, Katy
AU - Paek, Eun Jin
AU - Harmon, Tyson G.
AU - Yoon, Si On
AU - Themistocleous, Charalambos
AU - Yoo, Hyunsoo
AU - Aveni, Katharine
AU - Gutierrez, Stephanie
AU - Sharma, Saryu
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.
PY - 2021/2
Y1 - 2021/2
N2 - Purpose: The heterogeneous nature of measures, methods, and analyses reported in the aphasia spoken discourse literature precludes comparison of outcomes across studies (e.g., meta-analyses) and inhibits replication. Furthermore, funding and time constraints significantly hinder collecting test-retest data on spoken discourse outcomes. This research note describes the development and structure of a working group, designed to address major gaps in the spoken discourse aphasia literature, including a lack of standardization in methodology, analysis, and reporting, as well as nominal data regarding the psychometric properties of spoken discourse outcomes. Method: The initial initiatives for this working group are to (a) propose recommendations regarding standardization of spoken discourse collection, analysis, and reporting in aphasia, based on the results of an international survey and a systematic literature review and (b) create a database of test-retest spoken discourse data from individuals with and without aphasia. The survey of spoken discourse collection, analysis, and interpretation procedures was distributed to clinicians and researchers involved in aphasia assessment and rehabilitation from September to November 2019. We will publish survey results and recommend standards for collecting, analyzing, and reporting spoken discourse in aphasia. A multisite endeavor to collect test-retest spoken discourse data from individuals with and without aphasia will be initiated. This test-retest information will be contributed to a central site for transcription and analysis, and data will be subsequently openly curated. Conclusion: The goal of the working group is to create recommendations for field-wide standards in methods, analysis, and reporting of spoken discourse outcomes, as has been done across other related disciplines (e.g., Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials, Enhancing the Quality and Transparency of Health Research, Committee on Best Practice in Data Analysis and Sharing). Additionally, the creation of a database through our multisite collaboration will allow the identification of psychometrically sound outcome measures and norms that can be used by clinicians and researchers to assess spoken discourse abilities in aphasia.
AB - Purpose: The heterogeneous nature of measures, methods, and analyses reported in the aphasia spoken discourse literature precludes comparison of outcomes across studies (e.g., meta-analyses) and inhibits replication. Furthermore, funding and time constraints significantly hinder collecting test-retest data on spoken discourse outcomes. This research note describes the development and structure of a working group, designed to address major gaps in the spoken discourse aphasia literature, including a lack of standardization in methodology, analysis, and reporting, as well as nominal data regarding the psychometric properties of spoken discourse outcomes. Method: The initial initiatives for this working group are to (a) propose recommendations regarding standardization of spoken discourse collection, analysis, and reporting in aphasia, based on the results of an international survey and a systematic literature review and (b) create a database of test-retest spoken discourse data from individuals with and without aphasia. The survey of spoken discourse collection, analysis, and interpretation procedures was distributed to clinicians and researchers involved in aphasia assessment and rehabilitation from September to November 2019. We will publish survey results and recommend standards for collecting, analyzing, and reporting spoken discourse in aphasia. A multisite endeavor to collect test-retest spoken discourse data from individuals with and without aphasia will be initiated. This test-retest information will be contributed to a central site for transcription and analysis, and data will be subsequently openly curated. Conclusion: The goal of the working group is to create recommendations for field-wide standards in methods, analysis, and reporting of spoken discourse outcomes, as has been done across other related disciplines (e.g., Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials, Enhancing the Quality and Transparency of Health Research, Committee on Best Practice in Data Analysis and Sharing). Additionally, the creation of a database through our multisite collaboration will allow the identification of psychometrically sound outcome measures and norms that can be used by clinicians and researchers to assess spoken discourse abilities in aphasia.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85100926787&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85100926787&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1044/2020_AJSLP-19-00093
DO - 10.1044/2020_AJSLP-19-00093
M3 - Article
C2 - 32585117
AN - SCOPUS:85100926787
SN - 1058-0360
VL - 30
SP - 491
EP - 502
JO - American journal of speech-language pathology
JF - American journal of speech-language pathology
IS - 1s
ER -