TY - JOUR
T1 - Staying on track
T2 - Planned goal striving is protected from disruptive internal states
AU - Bayer, Ute C.
AU - Gollwitzer, Peter M.
AU - Achtziger, Anja
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank Sabine Ecke, Kirsten Hugendubel, Michaela Lieb und Carola Wendt for collecting the data and Andrea Myers for her valuable feedback on an earlier version of this manuscript. We gratefully acknowledge support received from both the German Research Foundation and the Leibniz Foundation.
PY - 2010/5
Y1 - 2010/5
N2 - Past implementation intention research focused on shielding goal striving from disruptive internal states (e.g., being anxious) by forming if-then plans that link these very states to instrumental coping responses. In the present line of research, we investigated whether planning out goal striving by means of if-then plans specifying opportunities to initiate goal-directed responses also protects goal striving from the negative impact of disruptive internal states. Indeed, in the face of disruptive internal states, participants who had been asked to form implementation intentions that targeted opportunities for initiating goal-directed responses outperformed participants with a mere goal intention to do well on a focal task goal. Actually, implementation intention participants performed as well as control participants who were not burdened by disruptive internal states such as being in a certain mood (Study 1), ego-depleted (Study 2), or self-definitionally incomplete (Study 3). Results are discussed by pointing to the importance of hypo-egoic self-regulation.
AB - Past implementation intention research focused on shielding goal striving from disruptive internal states (e.g., being anxious) by forming if-then plans that link these very states to instrumental coping responses. In the present line of research, we investigated whether planning out goal striving by means of if-then plans specifying opportunities to initiate goal-directed responses also protects goal striving from the negative impact of disruptive internal states. Indeed, in the face of disruptive internal states, participants who had been asked to form implementation intentions that targeted opportunities for initiating goal-directed responses outperformed participants with a mere goal intention to do well on a focal task goal. Actually, implementation intention participants performed as well as control participants who were not burdened by disruptive internal states such as being in a certain mood (Study 1), ego-depleted (Study 2), or self-definitionally incomplete (Study 3). Results are discussed by pointing to the importance of hypo-egoic self-regulation.
KW - Disruptive internal states
KW - Goal achievement
KW - Goal shielding
KW - Implementation intentions
KW - Self-regulation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77949873116&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77949873116&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jesp.2010.01.002
DO - 10.1016/j.jesp.2010.01.002
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:77949873116
SN - 0022-1031
VL - 46
SP - 505
EP - 514
JO - Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
JF - Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
IS - 3
ER -