TY - JOUR
T1 - Strategies for model reduction
T2 - Comparing different optimal bases
AU - Crommelin, D. T.
AU - Majda, A. J.
PY - 2004/9/1
Y1 - 2004/9/1
N2 - Several different ways of constructing optimal bases for efficient dynamical modeling are compared: empirical orthogonal functions (EOFs), optimal persistence patterns (OPPs), and principal interaction patterns (PIPs). Past studies on fluid-dynamical topics have pointed out that EOF-based models can have difficulties reproducing behavior dominated by irregular transitions between different dynamical states. This issue is addressed in a geophysical context, by assessing the ability of these strategies for efficient dynamical modeling to reproduce the chaotic regime transitions in a simple atmosphere model. The atmosphere model is the well-known Charney-DeVore model, a six-dimensional truncation of the equations describing barotropic flow over topography in a β-plane channel geometry. This-model is able to generate regime transitions for well-chosen parameter settings. The models based on PIPs are found to be superior to the EOF- and OPP-based models, in spite of some undesirable sensitivities inherent to the PIP method.
AB - Several different ways of constructing optimal bases for efficient dynamical modeling are compared: empirical orthogonal functions (EOFs), optimal persistence patterns (OPPs), and principal interaction patterns (PIPs). Past studies on fluid-dynamical topics have pointed out that EOF-based models can have difficulties reproducing behavior dominated by irregular transitions between different dynamical states. This issue is addressed in a geophysical context, by assessing the ability of these strategies for efficient dynamical modeling to reproduce the chaotic regime transitions in a simple atmosphere model. The atmosphere model is the well-known Charney-DeVore model, a six-dimensional truncation of the equations describing barotropic flow over topography in a β-plane channel geometry. This-model is able to generate regime transitions for well-chosen parameter settings. The models based on PIPs are found to be superior to the EOF- and OPP-based models, in spite of some undesirable sensitivities inherent to the PIP method.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=4844222391&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=4844222391&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1175/1520-0469(2004)061<2206:SFMRCD>2.0.CO;2
DO - 10.1175/1520-0469(2004)061<2206:SFMRCD>2.0.CO;2
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:4844222391
SN - 0022-4928
VL - 61
SP - 2206
EP - 2217
JO - Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
JF - Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
IS - 17
ER -