Suggestions to improve social work journal editorial and peer-review processes: The San Antonio response to the Miami statement

Gary Holden; Bruce A. Thyer; Judith Baer; Jorge Delva; Catherine N. Dulmus; Trina Williams Shanks

doi:10.1177/1049731507303496

Suggestions to improve social work journal editorial and peer-review processes: The San Antonio response to the Miami statement

Gary Holden, Bruce A. Thyer, Judith Baer, Jorge Delva, Catherine N. Dulmus, Trina Williams Shanks

Social Work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

Abstract

Interest in and concern about scholarly communications through social work journals seem to have increased recently. One indicator of this concern was the publication of the Miami statement. A Society for Social Work and Research Presidential Task Force was created to continue work on these issues. This article discusses the work of one subcommittee of that task force. This subcommittee developed a set of suggestions pertaining to the processes of submitting social work manuscripts to journals and to the system of editorial review and processing. The authors view these suggestions as expanding on the Miami statement.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	66-71
Number of pages	6
Journal	Research on Social Work Practice
Volume	18
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731507303496
State	Published - Jan 2008

Keywords

Author
Editor
Editorial
Journal
Manuscript
Open access
Peer review
Publication
Scholarship
Standards

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
Sociology and Political Science
Psychology(all)

Access to Document

10.1177/1049731507303496

Cite this

@article{79477e89eff64d67bc282eb5e838fc80,

title = "Suggestions to improve social work journal editorial and peer-review processes: The San Antonio response to the Miami statement",

abstract = "Interest in and concern about scholarly communications through social work journals seem to have increased recently. One indicator of this concern was the publication of the Miami statement. A Society for Social Work and Research Presidential Task Force was created to continue work on these issues. This article discusses the work of one subcommittee of that task force. This subcommittee developed a set of suggestions pertaining to the processes of submitting social work manuscripts to journals and to the system of editorial review and processing. The authors view these suggestions as expanding on the Miami statement.",

keywords = "Author, Editor, Editorial, Journal, Manuscript, Open access, Peer review, Publication, Scholarship, Standards",

author = "Gary Holden and Thyer, {Bruce A.} and Judith Baer and Jorge Delva and Dulmus, {Catherine N.} and Shanks, {Trina Williams}",

year = "2008",

month = jan,

doi = "10.1177/1049731507303496",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "18",

pages = "66--71",

journal = "Research on Social Work Practice",

issn = "1049-7315",

publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Suggestions to improve social work journal editorial and peer-review processes

T2 - The San Antonio response to the Miami statement

AU - Holden, Gary

AU - Thyer, Bruce A.

AU - Baer, Judith

AU - Delva, Jorge

AU - Dulmus, Catherine N.

AU - Shanks, Trina Williams

PY - 2008/1

Y1 - 2008/1

N2 - Interest in and concern about scholarly communications through social work journals seem to have increased recently. One indicator of this concern was the publication of the Miami statement. A Society for Social Work and Research Presidential Task Force was created to continue work on these issues. This article discusses the work of one subcommittee of that task force. This subcommittee developed a set of suggestions pertaining to the processes of submitting social work manuscripts to journals and to the system of editorial review and processing. The authors view these suggestions as expanding on the Miami statement.

AB - Interest in and concern about scholarly communications through social work journals seem to have increased recently. One indicator of this concern was the publication of the Miami statement. A Society for Social Work and Research Presidential Task Force was created to continue work on these issues. This article discusses the work of one subcommittee of that task force. This subcommittee developed a set of suggestions pertaining to the processes of submitting social work manuscripts to journals and to the system of editorial review and processing. The authors view these suggestions as expanding on the Miami statement.

KW - Author

KW - Editor

KW - Editorial

KW - Journal

KW - Manuscript

KW - Open access

KW - Peer review

KW - Publication

KW - Scholarship

KW - Standards

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=36849047777&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=36849047777&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1049731507303496

DO - 10.1177/1049731507303496

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:36849047777

SN - 1049-7315

VL - 18

SP - 66

EP - 71

JO - Research on Social Work Practice

JF - Research on Social Work Practice

IS - 1

ER -

Suggestions to improve social work journal editorial and peer-review processes: The San Antonio response to the Miami statement

Abstract

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this