TY - GEN
T1 - Swarm attack
T2 - 11th International Conference on Swarm Intelligence, ANTS 2018
AU - Primiero, Giuseppe
AU - Tuci, Elio
AU - Tagliabue, Jacopo
AU - Ferrante, Eliseo
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
N2 - Non-centralised behaviour such as those that characterise swarm robotics systems are vulnerable to intentional disruptions from internal or external adversarial sources. Threats in the context of swarm robotics can be executed through goal, behaviour, environment or communication manipulation. Experimental studies in this area are still sparse. We study an attack scenario performed by actively modifying the data between authorised participants. We formulate a robust probabilistic adaptive defence mechanism which does not aim at identifying malicious agents, but to provide the swarm with the means to minimise the consequences of the attack. The mechanism relies on a dynamic modification of the probability of agents to change their current information in view of new contradictory or corroborating incoming data. We investigate several experimental conditions in simulation. The results show that the presence of adversaries in the swarm hinders reaching consensus to the majority opinion when using a baseline method, but that there are several conditions in which our adaptive defence mechanism is highly efficient.
AB - Non-centralised behaviour such as those that characterise swarm robotics systems are vulnerable to intentional disruptions from internal or external adversarial sources. Threats in the context of swarm robotics can be executed through goal, behaviour, environment or communication manipulation. Experimental studies in this area are still sparse. We study an attack scenario performed by actively modifying the data between authorised participants. We formulate a robust probabilistic adaptive defence mechanism which does not aim at identifying malicious agents, but to provide the swarm with the means to minimise the consequences of the attack. The mechanism relies on a dynamic modification of the probability of agents to change their current information in view of new contradictory or corroborating incoming data. We investigate several experimental conditions in simulation. The results show that the presence of adversaries in the swarm hinders reaching consensus to the majority opinion when using a baseline method, but that there are several conditions in which our adaptive defence mechanism is highly efficient.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85055775146&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85055775146&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/978-3-030-00533-7_17
DO - 10.1007/978-3-030-00533-7_17
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85055775146
SN - 9783030005320
T3 - Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)
SP - 213
EP - 224
BT - Swarm Intelligence - 11th International Conference, ANTS 2018, Proceedings
A2 - Reina, Andreagiovanni
A2 - Christensen, Anders L.
A2 - Trianni, Vito
A2 - Blum, Christian
A2 - Dorigo, Marco
A2 - Birattari, Mauro
PB - Springer Verlag
Y2 - 29 October 2018 through 31 October 2018
ER -