TY - JOUR
T1 - Symmetry and hierarchy in social mobility
T2 - A methodological analysis of the CASMIN model of class mobility
AU - Hout, Michael
AU - Hauser, Robert M.
N1 - Funding Information:
Earlier versions of this paper were given at the meetings of the International Sociological Association, Madrid, Spain, in August 1990, and at the annual meeting of the Research Committee on Stratification and Mobility, International Sociological Association, Prague, Czechoslovakia, in June 1991. We are indebted to the members of the committee for their comments and questions. We have also benefited from the comments and suggestions we received from Eleanor Bell, Daniel Dohan, Robert Erikson, John Goldthorpe, Leo Goodman, Robert Mare, Adrian Raftery, and Raymond Wong and the research assistance of Eleanor Bell and Clement Brooks. We received research funding from the Survey Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, the National Institute on Aging (AG-7604), and the Spencer Foundation. Additional support was provided through core support grants from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD-5876) and the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation to the Center for Demography and Ecology at the University of Wisconsin, Madison. The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors.
PY - 1992/12
Y1 - 1992/12
N2 - The CASMIN model of class mobility proposed by Erikson and Goldthorpe advances our understanding of cross-national differences in social mobility in a number of important ways, most notably by showing how differences in the association between social origins and destinations reflect consequences of public policies that enhance or restrict opportunities. We respecify the CASMIN model in ways that clarify (a) the role of socio-economic differences among classes in mobility processes and (b) the extent of cross-national variation. In particular, the problems with the CASMIN model are its application to highly aggregated occupational classes, its suppression of hierarchical or vertical differences among classes, and its asymmetric classification of origin and destination classes. Our alternative specification is based on greater occupational detail, incorporates continuous covariates in linear-by-linear expressions that are analogous to regression models, and imposes symmetry on the association between origins and destinations. We find that the CASMIN model understates the importance of hierarchy relative to sector and inheritance in the determination of mobility patterns generally as well as in cross-national differences. Furthermore, the symmetry of our model facilitates the analysis of structural mobility as a factor that contributes to cross-national differences in overall mobility rates.
AB - The CASMIN model of class mobility proposed by Erikson and Goldthorpe advances our understanding of cross-national differences in social mobility in a number of important ways, most notably by showing how differences in the association between social origins and destinations reflect consequences of public policies that enhance or restrict opportunities. We respecify the CASMIN model in ways that clarify (a) the role of socio-economic differences among classes in mobility processes and (b) the extent of cross-national variation. In particular, the problems with the CASMIN model are its application to highly aggregated occupational classes, its suppression of hierarchical or vertical differences among classes, and its asymmetric classification of origin and destination classes. Our alternative specification is based on greater occupational detail, incorporates continuous covariates in linear-by-linear expressions that are analogous to regression models, and imposes symmetry on the association between origins and destinations. We find that the CASMIN model understates the importance of hierarchy relative to sector and inheritance in the determination of mobility patterns generally as well as in cross-national differences. Furthermore, the symmetry of our model facilitates the analysis of structural mobility as a factor that contributes to cross-national differences in overall mobility rates.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0009337477&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0009337477&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/oxfordjournals.esr.a036640
DO - 10.1093/oxfordjournals.esr.a036640
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0009337477
SN - 0266-7215
VL - 8
SP - 239
EP - 266
JO - European Sociological Review
JF - European Sociological Review
IS - 3
ER -