TY - JOUR
T1 - System-Centered Care
T2 - How Bureaucracy and Racialization Decenter Attempts at Person-Centered Mental Health Care
AU - Desai, Miraj U.
AU - Paranamana, Nadika
AU - Dovidio, John F.
AU - Davidson, Larry
AU - Stanhope, Victoria
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2022.
PY - 2023/5
Y1 - 2023/5
N2 - In this study, we explored structural biases in mental health organizations in the context of person-centered care—an emerging framework for health systems globally. The findings revealed how institutional structures powerfully condition clinical operations and providers, creating a risk that clients will be systemically seen as nonpersons, that is, as racialized or bureaucratic objects. Specifically, we elucidate how racial profiles could become determinants of care within institutions and how another, covert form of institutional objectification could emerge, in which clients are reduced to unseen bureaucratic objects. The findings illuminated a basic psychosocial process through which staff could become unwitting carriers of systemic agenda and intentionality—a type of “bureaucra-think”—and also how some providers pushed against this climate. These findings, and emergent novel concepts, add to the severely limited research on institutional bias and racism within psychological science.
AB - In this study, we explored structural biases in mental health organizations in the context of person-centered care—an emerging framework for health systems globally. The findings revealed how institutional structures powerfully condition clinical operations and providers, creating a risk that clients will be systemically seen as nonpersons, that is, as racialized or bureaucratic objects. Specifically, we elucidate how racial profiles could become determinants of care within institutions and how another, covert form of institutional objectification could emerge, in which clients are reduced to unseen bureaucratic objects. The findings illuminated a basic psychosocial process through which staff could become unwitting carriers of systemic agenda and intentionality—a type of “bureaucra-think”—and also how some providers pushed against this climate. These findings, and emergent novel concepts, add to the severely limited research on institutional bias and racism within psychological science.
KW - clinical psychological science
KW - health system
KW - implementation science
KW - institutional bias
KW - mental health services research
KW - structural racism
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85145307161&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85145307161&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/21677026221133053
DO - 10.1177/21677026221133053
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85145307161
SN - 2167-7026
VL - 11
SP - 476
EP - 489
JO - Clinical Psychological Science
JF - Clinical Psychological Science
IS - 3
ER -