tay's as good as cay: Reply

Martin Lettau, Sydney C. Ludvigson

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


    In a recent comment on our published work [Lettau, M., Ludvigson, S., 2001. Consumption, aggregate wealth, and expected stock returns. Journal of Finance 56, 815-850], Michael Brennan and Yihong Xia [2005. tay's as good as cay. Finance Research Letters 2, 1-14] advance the following argument: A "mechanistic" variable tay, where t is a linear time trend, forecasts stock returns. Since "t has no foresight," the argument goes, the predictive power of this variable must be attributable to what they call "look-ahead bias." The authors assert that cay is subject to the same look-ahead bias (generated because we use the full sample to estimate the cointegrating parameters in cay), implying that its forecasting power must be spurious. In this response, we explain why this critique is misplaced.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)15-22
    Number of pages8
    JournalFinance Research Letters
    Issue number1
    StatePublished - Mar 2005


    • Forecasting power
    • cay

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Finance


    Dive into the research topics of 'tay's as good as cay: Reply'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this