@article{c460ec55b83c49a1bdf13c5a378c208c,
title = "Teachers{\textquoteright} belief that math requires innate ability predicts lower intrinsic motivation among low-achieving students",
abstract = "Many students find math difficult, but those who are intrinsically motivated learn and do well even when they face obstacles. Here, we examine an environmental factor that might affect students' intrinsic motivation in math: namely, teachers' beliefs about success in math. Do teachers perceive elementary school math as a domain that requires an innate ability, and does this belief relate to students' intrinsic motivation in math? Our study explored these questions in a sample of 830 German fourth graders and their 56 teachers. Teachers reported stronger beliefs in the role of innate ability for math than for German language arts. In addition, the more teachers believed that math requires innate ability, the lower was the intrinsic motivation of their low-achieving students. These results suggest that teachers{\textquoteright} beliefs that math success depends on innate ability may be an important obstacle to creating a classroom atmosphere that fosters engagement and learning for all students.",
keywords = "Domain-specific ability beliefs, Elementary school, Intrinsic motivation, Mindset, Teachers",
author = "Anke Heyder and Weidinger, {Anne F.} and Andrei Cimpian and Ricarda Steinmayr",
note = "Funding Information: The research reported in this article is based on the project FA(IR)BULOUS – FAIRe BeUrteilung des LeistungspOtenzials von Sch{\"u}lerinnen Und Sch{\"u}ler (Fair Evaluation of Students' Academic Potential). The project was funded by the Stiftung Mercator (Mercator Foundation) . Furthermore, Anke Heyder's work on this publication was sponsored by the College for Interdisciplinary Educational Research , a joint initiative of the BMBF, the Jacobs Foundation, and the Leibniz Association . Andrei Cimpian's contribution was supported by grant BCS-1733897 from the US National Science Foundation . Funding Information: The research reported in this article is based on the project FA(IR)BULOUS ? FAIRe BeUrteilung des LeistungspOtenzials von Sch?lerinnen Und Sch?ler (Fair Evaluation of Students' Academic Potential). The project was funded by the Stiftung Mercator (Mercator Foundation). Furthermore, Anke Heyder's work on this publication was sponsored by the College for Interdisciplinary Educational Research, a joint initiative of the BMBF, the Jacobs Foundation, and the Leibniz Association. Andrei Cimpian's contribution was supported by grant BCS-1733897 from the US National Science Foundation. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2019 Elsevier Ltd",
year = "2020",
month = feb,
doi = "10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.101220",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "65",
journal = "Learning and Instruction",
issn = "0959-4752",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
}