TY - JOUR
T1 - Technology, demand, and productivity
T2 - What an industry model tells us about business cycles
AU - Molnárová, Zuzana
AU - Reiter, Michael
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the Austrian National Bank [Anniversary Fund project no. 16271].
Funding Information:
The authors would like to thank Radim Boháček, Davide Debortoli, Tamás Papp, Robert Kunst, Jordi Galí, John Fernald, Wouter den Haan, Morten Ravn, Leopold Zessner-Spitzenberg, and the seminar participants at VGSE Macro Breakfast seminar, Doctoral Workshop on Quantitative Dynamic Economics (Aix-Marseille University), CEF Oslo, EEA Mannheim, and SED Toulouse for their helpful comments. We would also like to thank the associate editor and two anonymous reviewers for their useful suggestions and comments on an earlier draft.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Authors
PY - 2022/1
Y1 - 2022/1
N2 - In this paper, we study the relative importance of demand and technology shocks in generating business cycle fluctuations, both at the aggregate level and at the level of individual industries. We construct a New Keynesian DSGE model that is highly disaggregated at the industry level with an input-output network structure. Measured productivity in the model fluctuates in response to both technology and demand shocks due to endogenous factor utilization. We estimate the model by the simulated method of moments using U.S. industry data from 1960 to 2005. We find that the aggregate technology shock has zero variance. Exogenous shocks to technology are necessary for our model to fit the data, but these shocks are exclusively industry-specific, uncorrelated across industries. The bulk of the aggregate fluctuations, including those in aggregate measured productivity, are explained through shocks to aggregate demand. This shock structure is supported by a host of information from the disaggregate data. Our second finding is that about half of the decrease in the cyclicality of measured productivity in the U.S. after the mid-1980s can be explained by the reduction in the importance of demand shocks, in line with the narrative of the great moderation.
AB - In this paper, we study the relative importance of demand and technology shocks in generating business cycle fluctuations, both at the aggregate level and at the level of individual industries. We construct a New Keynesian DSGE model that is highly disaggregated at the industry level with an input-output network structure. Measured productivity in the model fluctuates in response to both technology and demand shocks due to endogenous factor utilization. We estimate the model by the simulated method of moments using U.S. industry data from 1960 to 2005. We find that the aggregate technology shock has zero variance. Exogenous shocks to technology are necessary for our model to fit the data, but these shocks are exclusively industry-specific, uncorrelated across industries. The bulk of the aggregate fluctuations, including those in aggregate measured productivity, are explained through shocks to aggregate demand. This shock structure is supported by a host of information from the disaggregate data. Our second finding is that about half of the decrease in the cyclicality of measured productivity in the U.S. after the mid-1980s can be explained by the reduction in the importance of demand shocks, in line with the narrative of the great moderation.
KW - Business cycles
KW - Factor utilization
KW - Industries
KW - Input-output linkages
KW - Networks
KW - Productivity
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85119593324&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85119593324&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jedc.2021.104272
DO - 10.1016/j.jedc.2021.104272
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85119593324
SN - 0165-1889
VL - 134
JO - Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control
JF - Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control
M1 - 104272
ER -