TY - JOUR
T1 - Telephone vs. video visits during COVID-19
T2 - Safety-net provider perspectives
AU - Chang, Ji Eun
AU - Lindenfeld, Zoe
AU - Albert, Stephanie L.
AU - Massar, Rachel
AU - Shelley, Donna
AU - Kwok, Lorraine
AU - Fennelly, Kayla
AU - Berry, Carolyn A.
N1 - Funding Information:
This article was externally peer reviewed. Submitted 30 April 2021; revised 16 July 2021; accepted 21 July 2021. From the Department of Public Health Policy and Management, New York University School of Global Public Health (JEC, ZL, DS); Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine (SLA, RM, LK, KF, CAB). Funding: The preparation of this manuscript was supported by funding from RCHN Community Health Foundation. Conflict of interests: None. Corresponding author: Ji Eun Chang, PhD, 708 Broadway, New York, NY 10003, Phone: 212-992-5625 (E-mail: [email protected]).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 American Board of Family Medicine. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/11
Y1 - 2021/11
N2 - Objective: To review the frequency as well as the pros and cons of telephone and video-enabled telemedicine during the first 9 months of the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic as experienced by safety net providers across New York State (NYS). Methods: Analysis of visits to 36 community health centers (CHCs) in NYS by modality (telephone vs video) from February to November 2020. Semi-structured interviews with 25 primary care, behavioral health, and pediatric providers from 8 CHCs. Findings: In the week following the NYS stay-at-home order, video and telephone visits rose from 3.4 and 0% of total visits to 14.9 and 22.3%. At its peak, more than 60% of visits were conducted via telemedicine (April 2020) before tapering off to about 30% of visits (August 2020). Providers expressed a strong preference for video visits, particularly for situations when visual assessments were needed. Yet, more visits were conducted over telephone than video at all points throughout the pandemic. Video-specific advantages included enhanced ability to engage patients and use of visual cues to get a comprehensive look into the patient’s life, including social supports, hygiene, and medication adherence. Telephone presented unique benefits, including greater privacy, feasibility, and ease of use that make it critical to engage with key populations and as a backup for when video was not an option. Conclusions: Despite challenges, providers reported positive experiences delivering care remotely using both telephone and video during the COVID-19 pandemic and believe both modalities are critical for enabling access to care in the safety net.
AB - Objective: To review the frequency as well as the pros and cons of telephone and video-enabled telemedicine during the first 9 months of the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic as experienced by safety net providers across New York State (NYS). Methods: Analysis of visits to 36 community health centers (CHCs) in NYS by modality (telephone vs video) from February to November 2020. Semi-structured interviews with 25 primary care, behavioral health, and pediatric providers from 8 CHCs. Findings: In the week following the NYS stay-at-home order, video and telephone visits rose from 3.4 and 0% of total visits to 14.9 and 22.3%. At its peak, more than 60% of visits were conducted via telemedicine (April 2020) before tapering off to about 30% of visits (August 2020). Providers expressed a strong preference for video visits, particularly for situations when visual assessments were needed. Yet, more visits were conducted over telephone than video at all points throughout the pandemic. Video-specific advantages included enhanced ability to engage patients and use of visual cues to get a comprehensive look into the patient’s life, including social supports, hygiene, and medication adherence. Telephone presented unique benefits, including greater privacy, feasibility, and ease of use that make it critical to engage with key populations and as a backup for when video was not an option. Conclusions: Despite challenges, providers reported positive experiences delivering care remotely using both telephone and video during the COVID-19 pandemic and believe both modalities are critical for enabling access to care in the safety net.
KW - COVID-19
KW - Community health centers
KW - Health equity
KW - New York
KW - Safety-net providers
KW - Telemedicine
KW - SARS-CoV-2
KW - Pandemics
KW - Safety-net Providers
KW - Telephone
KW - Humans
KW - Child
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85120331651&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85120331651&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3122/JABFM.2021.06.210186
DO - 10.3122/JABFM.2021.06.210186
M3 - Review article
C2 - 34772766
AN - SCOPUS:85120331651
SN - 1557-2625
VL - 34
SP - 1103
EP - 1114
JO - Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
JF - Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
IS - 6
ER -