The benefit of no choice: goal-directed plans enhance perceptual processing

Markus Janczyk, Michael Dambacher, Maik Bieleke, Peter M. Gollwitzer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Choosing among different options is costly. Typically, response times are slower if participants can choose between several alternatives (free-choice) compared to when a stimulus determines a single correct response (forced-choice). This performance difference is commonly attributed to additional cognitive processing in free-choice tasks, which require time-consuming decisions between response options. Alternatively, the forced-choice advantage might result from facilitated perceptual processing, a prediction derived from the framework of implementation intentions. This hypothesis was tested in three experiments. Experiments 1 and 2 were PRP experiments and showed the expected underadditive interaction of the SOA manipulation and task type, pointing to a pre-central perceptual origin of the performance difference. Using the additive-factors logic, Experiment 3 further supported this view. We discuss the findings in the light of alternative accounts and offer potential mechanisms underlying performance differences in forced- and free-choice tasks.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)206-220
Number of pages15
JournalPsychological Research
Volume79
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The benefit of no choice: goal-directed plans enhance perceptual processing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this