The call for ecological validity is right but missing perceptual idiosyncrasies is wrong

Jennie Qu-Lee, Emily Balcetis

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Although psychology has long professed that perception predicts action, the strength of the evidence supporting the statement depends on the ecological validity of the technologies and paradigms used, particularly those that track eye movements, supporting Cesario's argument. While right to call for ecological validity, Cesario's model fails to account for individual differences in visual experience perceivers have when presented with the same stimulus.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere88
JournalBehavioral and Brain Sciences
Volume45
DOIs
StatePublished - May 13 2022

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Physiology
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The call for ecological validity is right but missing perceptual idiosyncrasies is wrong'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this