TY - JOUR
T1 - The call for ecological validity is right but missing perceptual idiosyncrasies is wrong
AU - Qu-Lee, Jennie
AU - Balcetis, Emily
N1 - Funding Information:
This research received no specific grant from any funding agency, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2022 The Author(s).
PY - 2022/5/13
Y1 - 2022/5/13
N2 - Although psychology has long professed that perception predicts action, the strength of the evidence supporting the statement depends on the ecological validity of the technologies and paradigms used, particularly those that track eye movements, supporting Cesario's argument. While right to call for ecological validity, Cesario's model fails to account for individual differences in visual experience perceivers have when presented with the same stimulus.
AB - Although psychology has long professed that perception predicts action, the strength of the evidence supporting the statement depends on the ecological validity of the technologies and paradigms used, particularly those that track eye movements, supporting Cesario's argument. While right to call for ecological validity, Cesario's model fails to account for individual differences in visual experience perceivers have when presented with the same stimulus.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85130638913&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85130638913&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1017/S0140525X21000807
DO - 10.1017/S0140525X21000807
M3 - Review article
C2 - 35550215
AN - SCOPUS:85130638913
SN - 0140-525X
VL - 45
JO - Behavioral and Brain Sciences
JF - Behavioral and Brain Sciences
M1 - e88
ER -