TY - JOUR
T1 - The Costs of Polarizing a Pandemic
T2 - Antecedents, Consequences, and Lessons
AU - Van Bavel, Jay J.
AU - Pretus, Clara
AU - Rathje, Steve
AU - Pärnamets, Philip
AU - Vlasceanu, Madalina
AU - Knowles, Eric D.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2023.
PY - 2024/7
Y1 - 2024/7
N2 - Polarization has been rising in the United States of America for the past few decades and now poses a significant—and growing—public-health risk. One of the signature features of the American response to the COVID-19 pandemic has been the degree to which perceptions of risk and willingness to follow public-health recommendations have been politically polarized. Although COVID-19 has proven more lethal than any war or public-health crisis in American history, the deadly consequences of the pandemic were exacerbated by polarization. We review research detailing how every phase of the COVID-19 pandemic has been polarized, including judgments of risk, spatial distancing, mask wearing, and vaccination. We describe the role of political ideology, partisan identity, leadership, misinformation, and mass communication in this public-health crisis. We then assess the overall impact of polarization on infections, illness, and mortality during the pandemic; offer a psychological analysis of key policy questions; and identify a set of future research questions for scholars and policy experts. Our analysis suggests that the catastrophic death toll in the United States was largely preventable and due, in large part, to the polarization of the pandemic. Finally, we discuss implications for public policy to help avoid the same deadly mistakes in future public-health crises.
AB - Polarization has been rising in the United States of America for the past few decades and now poses a significant—and growing—public-health risk. One of the signature features of the American response to the COVID-19 pandemic has been the degree to which perceptions of risk and willingness to follow public-health recommendations have been politically polarized. Although COVID-19 has proven more lethal than any war or public-health crisis in American history, the deadly consequences of the pandemic were exacerbated by polarization. We review research detailing how every phase of the COVID-19 pandemic has been polarized, including judgments of risk, spatial distancing, mask wearing, and vaccination. We describe the role of political ideology, partisan identity, leadership, misinformation, and mass communication in this public-health crisis. We then assess the overall impact of polarization on infections, illness, and mortality during the pandemic; offer a psychological analysis of key policy questions; and identify a set of future research questions for scholars and policy experts. Our analysis suggests that the catastrophic death toll in the United States was largely preventable and due, in large part, to the polarization of the pandemic. Finally, we discuss implications for public policy to help avoid the same deadly mistakes in future public-health crises.
KW - COVID-19
KW - pandemic
KW - polarization
KW - politics
KW - psychology
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85173925198&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85173925198&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/17456916231190395
DO - 10.1177/17456916231190395
M3 - Article
C2 - 37811599
AN - SCOPUS:85173925198
SN - 1745-6916
VL - 19
SP - 624
EP - 639
JO - Perspectives on Psychological Science
JF - Perspectives on Psychological Science
IS - 4
ER -