Abstract
The proposals that have emerged from the DSM-5 revision process have triggered considerable controversy, especially regarding potential invalid inflation of diagnostic categories. To illustrate the kinds of issues that have emerged, I closely examine the proposed new categories of sexual disorder. The DSM-5 Sexual and Gender Identity Disorders Work Group is proposing the addition of three categories of disorder to the DSM-5-hypersexuality, hebephilia (as part of a revised pedophilia category that would become pedohebephilia), and coercive paraphilic disorder (basically a "nonconsent" or rape paraphilia). These proposals are driven by perceived clinical or forensic needs. I argue, however, that their conceptual soundness remains problematic; each could lead to large numbers of false positive diagnoses (i. e., diagnoses that mistakenly label a normal variant of behavior as a mental disorder), with potential for serious forensic abuse in "sexually violent predator" civil commitment proceedings.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 213-223 |
Number of pages | 11 |
Journal | Clinical Social Work Journal |
Volume | 40 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jun 2012 |
Keywords
- DSM-5
- Diagnosis
- False positive
- Harmful dysfunction
- Hebephilia
- Hypersexual disorder
- Paraphilic coercive disorder
- Sexual disorder
- Validity
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Health(social science)
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health