The DSM's theory-neutral nosology is scientifically progressive: Response to Follette and Houts (1996)

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

W. C. Follette and A. C. Houts (1996) argued on philosophy-of-science grounds that the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) is scientifically unprogressive and should be replaced by competing theory- laden manuals. The author responds to their various arguments as follows: (a) The ways things can go wrong with the mind are inherently diverse, so failure to reduce the DSM's categories to 1 parsimonious theory is not necessarily scientifically unprogressive; (b) it is empirically untrue that growth in the number of a taxonomy's categories is inconsistent with scientific progress; (c) progress in theoretically fragmented fields requires shared theory- neutral categories, not theory-laden definitions of basic concepts; (d) at present in the mental health field, theoretical integration is scientifically more progressive than competition, and integration is promoted by the DSM's theory-neutral nosology; and (e) Follette and Houts's proposed behaviorist alternative to the DSM is incoherent.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)846-852
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of consulting and clinical psychology
Volume66
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1998

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The DSM's theory-neutral nosology is scientifically progressive: Response to Follette and Houts (1996)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this