TY - JOUR
T1 - The effect of osseodensification drilling for endosteal implants with different surface treatments
T2 - A study in sheep
AU - Lahens, Bradley
AU - Lopez, Christopher D.
AU - Neiva, Rodrigo F.
AU - Bowers, Michelle M.
AU - Jimbo, Ryo
AU - Bonfante, Estevam A.
AU - Morcos, Jonathan
AU - Witek, Lukasz
AU - Tovar, Nick
AU - Coelho, Paulo G.
N1 - Funding Information:
Correspondence to: E. A. Bonfante; e-mail: [email protected] Contract grant sponsor: BrrTech, FAPESP; contract grant number: 2012/19078–7, 2016/18818–8 Contract grant sponsor: Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq); contract grant number: 304589/2017-9
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
PY - 2019/4
Y1 - 2019/4
N2 - This study investigated the effects of osseodensification drilling on the stability and osseointegration of machine-cut and acid-etched endosteal implants in low-density bone. Twelve sheep received six implants inserted into the ilium, bilaterally (n = 36 acid-etched, and n = 36 as-machined). Individual animals received three implants of each surface, placed via different surgical techniques: (1) subtractive regular-drilling (R): 2.0 mm pilot, 3.2 and 3.8 mm twist drills); (2) osseodensification clockwise-drilling (CW): Densah Bur (Versah, Jackson, MI) 2.0 mm pilot, 2.8, and 3.8 mm multifluted tapered burs; and (3) osseodensification counterclockwise-drilling (CCW) Densah Bur 2.0 mm pilot, 2.8 mm, and 3.8 mm multifluted tapered burs. Insertion torque was higher in the CCW and CW-drilling compared to the R-drilling (p < 0.001). Bone-to-implant contact (BIC) was significantly higher for CW (p = 0.024) and CCW-drilling (p = 0.006) compared to the R-drilling technique. For CCW-osseodensification-drilling, no statistical difference between the acid-etched and machine-cut implants at both time points was observed for BIC and BAFO (bone-area-fraction-occupancy). Resorbed bone and bone forming precursors, preosteoblasts, were observed at 3-weeks. At 12-weeks, new bone formation was observed in all groups extending to the trabecular region. In low-density bone, endosteal implants inserted via osseodensification-drilling presented higher stability and no osseointegration impairments compared to subtractive regular-drilling technique, regardless of evaluation time or implant surface.
AB - This study investigated the effects of osseodensification drilling on the stability and osseointegration of machine-cut and acid-etched endosteal implants in low-density bone. Twelve sheep received six implants inserted into the ilium, bilaterally (n = 36 acid-etched, and n = 36 as-machined). Individual animals received three implants of each surface, placed via different surgical techniques: (1) subtractive regular-drilling (R): 2.0 mm pilot, 3.2 and 3.8 mm twist drills); (2) osseodensification clockwise-drilling (CW): Densah Bur (Versah, Jackson, MI) 2.0 mm pilot, 2.8, and 3.8 mm multifluted tapered burs; and (3) osseodensification counterclockwise-drilling (CCW) Densah Bur 2.0 mm pilot, 2.8 mm, and 3.8 mm multifluted tapered burs. Insertion torque was higher in the CCW and CW-drilling compared to the R-drilling (p < 0.001). Bone-to-implant contact (BIC) was significantly higher for CW (p = 0.024) and CCW-drilling (p = 0.006) compared to the R-drilling technique. For CCW-osseodensification-drilling, no statistical difference between the acid-etched and machine-cut implants at both time points was observed for BIC and BAFO (bone-area-fraction-occupancy). Resorbed bone and bone forming precursors, preosteoblasts, were observed at 3-weeks. At 12-weeks, new bone formation was observed in all groups extending to the trabecular region. In low-density bone, endosteal implants inserted via osseodensification-drilling presented higher stability and no osseointegration impairments compared to subtractive regular-drilling technique, regardless of evaluation time or implant surface.
KW - bone
KW - histologic
KW - implant
KW - insertion torque
KW - osseodensification
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052456580&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85052456580&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/jbm.b.34154
DO - 10.1002/jbm.b.34154
M3 - Article
C2 - 30080320
AN - SCOPUS:85052456580
SN - 1552-4973
VL - 107
SP - 615
EP - 623
JO - Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials
JF - Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials
IS - 3
ER -