TY - JOUR
T1 - The Effects of Two Mindset Interventions on Low-Income Students’ Academic and Psychological Outcomes
AU - Gandhi, Jill
AU - Watts, Tyler W.
AU - Masucci, Michael D.
AU - Raver, C. Cybele
N1 - Funding Information:
Research reported in this publication was supported by the Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, under award number R305A160176 ($3,210,436). This project was 100% financed with federal money. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the Institute of Education Sciences. We are grateful to David Yeager, Alejandro Ganimian, Chen Li, Javanna Obregon, and Alaa Khader for their helpful contributions to this project. We would also like to thank Chicago Public Schools and the dedicated center directors, teachers, families, and students who made the Chicago School Readiness Project possible.
PY - 2020/4/2
Y1 - 2020/4/2
N2 - This study examined two widely available light-touch, writing-based mindset interventions: one that targeted students’ purpose for learning and one that aimed to increase students’ growth mindset. In order to examine the potential mechanisms underlying previously reported effects of mindset interventions, we analyzed these interventions’ effects on low-income, ethnic minority adolescents’ academic outcomes, task persistence, task-relevant anxiety, critical motivation, and sense of belonging. Results indicated that the purpose for learning intervention had a small negative impact on students’ self-reported grades the following year, and null results for the other outcomes. The growth mindset intervention was administered one year following the purpose for learning intervention and we found no evidence of treatment impacts on any outcomes. Analyses of treatment impact moderation suggested that certain student characteristics, such as student gender and race could play a role, but most of these tests also presented null results. The primarily null results of both interventions suggest that further study is needed to determine the effectiveness of one-time, self-administered mindset interventions across a variety of contexts and student populations.
AB - This study examined two widely available light-touch, writing-based mindset interventions: one that targeted students’ purpose for learning and one that aimed to increase students’ growth mindset. In order to examine the potential mechanisms underlying previously reported effects of mindset interventions, we analyzed these interventions’ effects on low-income, ethnic minority adolescents’ academic outcomes, task persistence, task-relevant anxiety, critical motivation, and sense of belonging. Results indicated that the purpose for learning intervention had a small negative impact on students’ self-reported grades the following year, and null results for the other outcomes. The growth mindset intervention was administered one year following the purpose for learning intervention and we found no evidence of treatment impacts on any outcomes. Analyses of treatment impact moderation suggested that certain student characteristics, such as student gender and race could play a role, but most of these tests also presented null results. The primarily null results of both interventions suggest that further study is needed to determine the effectiveness of one-time, self-administered mindset interventions across a variety of contexts and student populations.
KW - Mindset interventions
KW - academic interventions
KW - growth mindset
KW - purpose for learning
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85081557117&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85081557117&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/19345747.2019.1711272
DO - 10.1080/19345747.2019.1711272
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85081557117
SN - 1934-5747
VL - 13
SP - 351
EP - 379
JO - Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness
JF - Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness
IS - 2
ER -