TY - JOUR
T1 - The epidemiology of observed temperament
T2 - Factor structure and demographic group differences
AU - Willoughby, Michael T.
AU - Stifter, Cynthia A.
AU - Gottfredson, Nisha C.
AU - Vernon-Feagans, Lynne
AU - Cox, Martha
AU - Blair, Clancy
AU - Burchinal, Peg
AU - Burton, Linda
AU - Crnic, Keith
AU - Crouter, Ann
AU - Garrett-Peters, Patricia
AU - Greenberg, Mark
AU - Lanza, Stephanie
AU - Mills-Koonce, Roger
AU - Skinner, Debra
AU - Stifter, Cynthia
AU - Werner, Emily
AU - Willoughby, Michael
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2015/5/1
Y1 - 2015/5/1
N2 - This study investigated the factor structure of observational indicators of children's temperament that were collected across the first three years of life in the Family Life Project (N=1205) sample. A four-factor model (activity level, fear, anger, regulation), which corresponded broadly to Rothbart's distinction between reactivity and regulation, provided an acceptable fit the observed data. Tests of measurement invariance demonstrated that a majority of the observational indicators exhibited comparable measurement properties for male vs. female, black vs. white, and poor vs. not-poor children, which improved the generalizability of these results. Unadjusted demographic group comparisons revealed small to moderate sized differences (Cohen ds=|.23-.42|) in temperamental reactivity and moderate to large sized differences (Cohen ds=-.64--.97) in regulation. Collectively, demographic variables explained more of the variation in regulation (R2=25) than in reactivity (R2=02-.06). Follow-up analyses demonstrated that race differences were substantially diminished in magnitude and better accounted for by poverty. These results help to validate the distinction between temperamental reactivity and regulation using observational indicators.
AB - This study investigated the factor structure of observational indicators of children's temperament that were collected across the first three years of life in the Family Life Project (N=1205) sample. A four-factor model (activity level, fear, anger, regulation), which corresponded broadly to Rothbart's distinction between reactivity and regulation, provided an acceptable fit the observed data. Tests of measurement invariance demonstrated that a majority of the observational indicators exhibited comparable measurement properties for male vs. female, black vs. white, and poor vs. not-poor children, which improved the generalizability of these results. Unadjusted demographic group comparisons revealed small to moderate sized differences (Cohen ds=|.23-.42|) in temperamental reactivity and moderate to large sized differences (Cohen ds=-.64--.97) in regulation. Collectively, demographic variables explained more of the variation in regulation (R2=25) than in reactivity (R2=02-.06). Follow-up analyses demonstrated that race differences were substantially diminished in magnitude and better accounted for by poverty. These results help to validate the distinction between temperamental reactivity and regulation using observational indicators.
KW - Confirmatory factor analysis
KW - Latent variable
KW - Reactivity
KW - Regulation
KW - Temperament
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84923352693&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84923352693&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.infbeh.2015.02.001
DO - 10.1016/j.infbeh.2015.02.001
M3 - Article
C2 - 25733489
AN - SCOPUS:84923352693
SN - 0163-6383
VL - 39
SP - 21
EP - 34
JO - Infant Behavior and Development
JF - Infant Behavior and Development
ER -