TY - JOUR
T1 - The Ethic of Care and Women's Eexperiences of Puplic Space
AU - Day, Kristen
N1 - Funding Information:
(1) This project was funded by the National Institute of Mental Health and by the University of California, Irvine. I am grateful for superb research assistance from Alia Hokuki, Sandra Chen, Tina Howard, Emiko Isa, Jennifer Katchmar, Sze Lei Leong, Nazanine Nodjoumi, Uyen Pham, Steve Sung, and Melinda Tan. (2) In 1990, 49 per cent of U.S. women were engaged in wage work outside of the home (compared to 60% of men) (U.S. Census Bureau, 1998). Additionally, the trend towards post-suburban (decentralized) geography in the U.S. and in some other Western countries (cf. Soja, 1989; Davis, 1991; Garreau, 1991; Watson & Gibson, 1995) means that many women no longer experience rigid divisions between urban (public) and suburban (private) environments. (3) Chodorow's theory of object relations has received similar criticisms (Collins, 1991). (4) The burden and the meaning of caring varies with race/ethnicity and class, as well as with marital and parental status (cf. Woodward & Green, 1988; Henderson & Bialeschki, 1991; Preston et al., 1993; Blumen, 1994). (5) Likewise, justice is required in decision-making in the `personal' domain of the home (Clement, 1996). (6) `Public spaces' refer loosely to generally-accessible places outside of the home, which are used on a temporary basis (after Franck & Paxson, 1989). Women's use of public spaces includes activities such as recreation, travel, exercise, and errands, as well as some aspects of household and wage work. For women, at least, adoption of a `universal' continuum between public-and private-spaces (e.g. based only on ownership of the space, or on the nature of social relationships) is not necessarily meaningful. The perceived publicness of spaces must be considered in the context of characteristics of particular spaces and users (including characteristics such as function of the space, race and class characteristics of the individual and of other users, characteristics of the broader geographic location, etc.) (see Day, 1999a). (7) Women's high fear in public space is also due to specific fear of sexual assault (Gordon & Riger, 1989). (8) For people of color, `race fear' stems from race prejudice, and also from historical and contemporary, race-motivated violence committed by white and non-white people against people of color (Davis, 1981). Increased personal information may be useful for distinguishing potential hate crime-offenders and race oppressors from others.
PY - 2000/6
Y1 - 2000/6
N2 - Women's use of public space has been the subject of much recent research. Existing theory in environment-behavior studies is inadequate to explain these findings. This paper proposes the adoption of the feminist theory of the 'ethic of care' to synthesize and explain much existing research on women's experience of public space. The ethic of care is a model of moral development in which the highest moral imperative requires taking care of needs and sustaining relationships. This paper examines how the ethic of care creates constraints for women's use of public space, by encouraging women to put others first and by reinforcing women's primary responsibility for care-giving. The ethic of care constrains women's use of public space through the association of women with low status 'caring' occupations, and through actions that extend restrictive caring to women. At the same time, through women's use of public space, the ethic of care generates possibilities for women to give and receive care from others and themselves, and creates possibilities for extending care to encompass public spaces. The ethic of care is explored in detail in light of two areas of environment-behavior research on women and public spaces: preference and fear of crime. In conclusion, the paper advocates the ethic of care as a framework for future activism, design, and scholarship concerning public spaces.
AB - Women's use of public space has been the subject of much recent research. Existing theory in environment-behavior studies is inadequate to explain these findings. This paper proposes the adoption of the feminist theory of the 'ethic of care' to synthesize and explain much existing research on women's experience of public space. The ethic of care is a model of moral development in which the highest moral imperative requires taking care of needs and sustaining relationships. This paper examines how the ethic of care creates constraints for women's use of public space, by encouraging women to put others first and by reinforcing women's primary responsibility for care-giving. The ethic of care constrains women's use of public space through the association of women with low status 'caring' occupations, and through actions that extend restrictive caring to women. At the same time, through women's use of public space, the ethic of care generates possibilities for women to give and receive care from others and themselves, and creates possibilities for extending care to encompass public spaces. The ethic of care is explored in detail in light of two areas of environment-behavior research on women and public spaces: preference and fear of crime. In conclusion, the paper advocates the ethic of care as a framework for future activism, design, and scholarship concerning public spaces.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0004692498&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0004692498&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1006/jevp.1999.0152
DO - 10.1006/jevp.1999.0152
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0004692498
SN - 0272-4944
VL - 20
SP - 103
EP - 124
JO - Journal of Environmental Psychology
JF - Journal of Environmental Psychology
IS - 2
ER -