TY - JOUR
T1 - The face to face encounter of art and law
T2 - Abbas kiarostami's close-Up
AU - Vatulescu, Cristina
PY - 2011/6
Y1 - 2011/6
N2 - The title of this article is taken from Abbas Kiarostami's commentary on his 1990 film Close-Up (Nema-ye Nazdik), one of the most memorable meditations on the medium of film andits relationship to the law. Kiarostami's commentary posits cinema's approach to the human subject to be superior to that of the law in its ability to defer judgment while allowing a close-up approach to the subject-an approach that, he wagers, can ultimately not only just(ly) represent but also transform that subject. However, an attentive reading of the movie itself complicates the easy dichotomy between law and art, nuancing their differences and showing the legal and artistic approaches to the human subject to be entangled, nowhere more closely than in the charged stylistic and ethical choice of the close-up itself. This essay follows the movie's complex interrogation of that encounter between law, art, and its subject. In the process, we see Kiarostami redefine cinema as a medium whose primary task is precisely to mediate: between law and its subjects, as between people and their clashing fantasies. To be able to do this, however, the film itself is transformed by the encounter with the law and its subject, opening the way for a new type of documentary filmmaking-not just antimimetic, but blatantly minterventionist, interpersonal and interactive.
AB - The title of this article is taken from Abbas Kiarostami's commentary on his 1990 film Close-Up (Nema-ye Nazdik), one of the most memorable meditations on the medium of film andits relationship to the law. Kiarostami's commentary posits cinema's approach to the human subject to be superior to that of the law in its ability to defer judgment while allowing a close-up approach to the subject-an approach that, he wagers, can ultimately not only just(ly) represent but also transform that subject. However, an attentive reading of the movie itself complicates the easy dichotomy between law and art, nuancing their differences and showing the legal and artistic approaches to the human subject to be entangled, nowhere more closely than in the charged stylistic and ethical choice of the close-up itself. This essay follows the movie's complex interrogation of that encounter between law, art, and its subject. In the process, we see Kiarostami redefine cinema as a medium whose primary task is precisely to mediate: between law and its subjects, as between people and their clashing fantasies. To be able to do this, however, the film itself is transformed by the encounter with the law and its subject, opening the way for a new type of documentary filmmaking-not just antimimetic, but blatantly minterventionist, interpersonal and interactive.
KW - Abbas
KW - Close-Up
KW - Documentary
KW - Freeze-frame
KW - Kiarostami
KW - Law and cinema
KW - Mug shot
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80053418051&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80053418051&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1525/lal.2011.23.2.173
DO - 10.1525/lal.2011.23.2.173
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:80053418051
SN - 1535-685X
VL - 23
SP - 173
EP - 194
JO - Law and Literature
JF - Law and Literature
IS - 2
ER -