The Hidden Disequities of Carbon Trading: Carbon Emissions, Air Toxics, and Environmental Justice

Raul P. Lejano, Wing Shan Kan, Ching Chit Chau

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

So long as transaction costs are low, the creation of a tradeable permit to emit carbon should allow bargaining for emission rights among buyers and sellers, resulting in an efficient allocation of carbon emission rights. However, the trading of carbon credits may have socially unjust consequences. In this article, we explore some hitherto unrecognized disequities. One of these may be the creation of toxic hotspots as the trade of carbon may bring with it a transfer of air toxics, as well. We illustrate the argument by examining emissions from refineries participating in California’s cap-and-trade program. These considerations are a concern for the larger question of carbon mitigation as the global community strives to identify feasible, yet just, approaches to reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Contrary to the idea of alienable rights, the transfer of carbon affects people and place in ways not internalized by these market instruments.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number593014
JournalFrontiers in Environmental Science
Volume8
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 10 2020

Keywords

  • air toxics
  • cap-and-trade
  • carbon trading
  • environmental justice
  • ethics
  • public policy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Science(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The Hidden Disequities of Carbon Trading: Carbon Emissions, Air Toxics, and Environmental Justice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this