TY - JOUR
T1 - The human auditory system uses amplitude modulation to distinguish music from speech
AU - Chang, Andrew
AU - Teng, Xiangbin
AU - Assaneo, M. Florencia
AU - Poeppel, David
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Chang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
PY - 2024/5
Y1 - 2024/5
N2 - AMUus:icPalenadsescpoeneficrmhtahraetaclolhmeapdleinxgalenvdeldsaisrteinrecptraeusednittoedrycosrigrencatllsy:that are both foundational to the human experience. The mechanisms underpinning each domain are widely investigated. However, what perceptual mechanism transforms a sound into music or speech and how basicAaUco:uPslteicasinefnoortmetahatitoanspiserrPeLqOuiSrestdylteo; idtaisltiicnsgshuoisuhldbneottwbeeuesnedtfhoeremmrpehmasaisin:Hoepnecne;qpuleeassteiocnonsf.irmthattheitalicizedbasicinthesentenceHowever; Here, we hypothesized that a sound's amplitude modulation (AM), an essential temporal acoustic feature driving the auditory system across processing levels, is critical for distinguishing music and speech. Specifically, in contrast to paradigms using naturalistic acoustic signals (that can be challenging to interpret), we used a noise-probing approach to untangle the auditory mechanism: If AM rate and regularity are critical for perceptually distinguishing music and speech, judging artificially noise-synthesized ambiguous audio signals should align with their AM parameters. Across 4 experiments (N = 335), signals with a higher peak AM frequency tend to be judged as speech, lower as music. Interestingly, this principle is consistently used by all listeners for speech judgments, but only by musically sophisticated listeners for music. In addition, signals with more regular AM are judged as music over speech, and this feature is more critical for music judgment, regardless of musical sophistication. The data suggest that the auditory system can rely on a low-level acoustic property as basic as AM to distinguish music from speech, a simple principle that provokes both neurophysiological and evolutionary experiments and speculations.
AB - AMUus:icPalenadsescpoeneficrmhtahraetaclolhmeapdleinxgalenvdeldsaisrteinrecptraeusednittoedrycosrigrencatllsy:that are both foundational to the human experience. The mechanisms underpinning each domain are widely investigated. However, what perceptual mechanism transforms a sound into music or speech and how basicAaUco:uPslteicasinefnoortmetahatitoanspiserrPeLqOuiSrestdylteo; idtaisltiicnsgshuoisuhldbneottwbeeuesnedtfhoeremmrpehmasaisin:Hoepnecne;qpuleeassteiocnonsf.irmthattheitalicizedbasicinthesentenceHowever; Here, we hypothesized that a sound's amplitude modulation (AM), an essential temporal acoustic feature driving the auditory system across processing levels, is critical for distinguishing music and speech. Specifically, in contrast to paradigms using naturalistic acoustic signals (that can be challenging to interpret), we used a noise-probing approach to untangle the auditory mechanism: If AM rate and regularity are critical for perceptually distinguishing music and speech, judging artificially noise-synthesized ambiguous audio signals should align with their AM parameters. Across 4 experiments (N = 335), signals with a higher peak AM frequency tend to be judged as speech, lower as music. Interestingly, this principle is consistently used by all listeners for speech judgments, but only by musically sophisticated listeners for music. In addition, signals with more regular AM are judged as music over speech, and this feature is more critical for music judgment, regardless of musical sophistication. The data suggest that the auditory system can rely on a low-level acoustic property as basic as AM to distinguish music from speech, a simple principle that provokes both neurophysiological and evolutionary experiments and speculations.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85194404109&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85194404109&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002631
DO - 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002631
M3 - Article
C2 - 38805517
AN - SCOPUS:85194404109
SN - 1544-9173
VL - 22
JO - PLoS biology
JF - PLoS biology
IS - 5 May
M1 - e3002631
ER -