Abstract
Even Coke joked. His humour, however, has not been taken up by commentators. Even less so his satirical allusions. It is but one instance of the way in which the humorous genre of satire has been almost completely ignored by jurists. They find it threatening, they don't know what to do with it, and it infracts antique norms of ecclesiastical dogma that common law has yet to properly examine. This article elicits the historical and theoretical reasons for the doctrinal repression of the satirical. It sets about the lengthy task of remedying the exclusion of satire from legal analysis.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 43-58 |
Number of pages | 16 |
Journal | Social Semiotics |
Volume | 15 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Apr 2005 |
Keywords
- Coke
- Genre
- Horace
- Humour
- Legality
- Quintilian
- Satire
- Stillingfleete
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Cultural Studies
- Language and Linguistics
- Communication
- Linguistics and Language