Abstract
Humans are essentialists: They believe hidden “essences” underlie membership in natural and social kinds. Although essentialism has well-established implications for important societal issues (e.g., discrimination), little is known about its origins. According to a recent proposal, essentialism emerges from a broader inherence heuristic—an intuitive tendency to explain patterns in terms of the inherent properties of their constituents (e.g., we have orange juice for breakfast [pattern] because citrus aromas [inherent feature] wake us up). We tested two predictions of this proposal—that reliance on the inherence heuristic predicts endorsement of essentialist beliefs, even when adjusting for potentially confounding variables (Studies 1 and 2), and that reducing reliance on the inherence heuristic produces a downstream reduction in essentialist thought (Studies 3 and 4). The results were consistent with these predictions and thus provided evidence for a new theoretical perspective on the cognitive underpinnings of psychological essentialism.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1297-1315 |
Number of pages | 19 |
Journal | Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin |
Volume | 40 |
Issue number | 10 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Oct 8 2014 |
Keywords
- heuristics and biases
- inherence heuristic
- prejudice
- psychological essentialism
- stereotyping
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Social Psychology