The interaction of compositional semantics and event semantics

Lucas Champollion

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


    Davidsonian event semantics is often taken to form an unhappy marriage with compositional semantics. For example, it has been claimed to be problematic for semantic accounts of quantification (Beaver and Condoravdi, in: Aloni et al. (eds.) Proceedings of the 16th Amsterdam Colloquium, 2007), for classical accounts of negation (Krifka, in: Bartsch et al. (eds.) Semantics and contextual expression, 1989), and for intersective accounts of verbal coordination (Lasersohn, in Plurality, conjunction and events, 1995). This paper shows that none of this is the case, once we abandon the idea that the event variable is bound at sentence level, and assume instead that verbs denote existential quantifiers over events. Quantificational arguments can then be given a semantic account, negation can be treated classically, and coordination can be modeled as intersection. The framework presented here is a natural choice for researchers and fieldworkers who wish to sketch a semantic analysis of a language without being forced to make commitments about the hierarchical order of arguments, the argument-adjunct distinction, the default scope of quantifiers, or the nature of negation and coordination.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)31-66
    Number of pages36
    JournalLinguistics and Philosophy
    Issue number1
    StatePublished - Feb 2015


    • Conjunction
    • Coordination
    • Event semantics
    • For-adverbials
    • Negation
    • Quantifiers
    • Thematic roles

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Philosophy
    • Linguistics and Language


    Dive into the research topics of 'The interaction of compositional semantics and event semantics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this