TY - JOUR
T1 - The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
T2 - Challenges and Opportunities
AU - Vardy, Mark
AU - Oppenheimer, Michael
AU - Dubash, Navroz K.
AU - O'Reilly, Jessica
AU - Jamieson, Dale
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 by Annual Reviews. All rights reserved.
PY - 2017/10/17
Y1 - 2017/10/17
N2 - The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) conducts policy-relevant but not policy-prescriptive assessments of climate science. In this review, we engage with some of the key design features, achievements, and challenges that situate and characterize the IPCC as an intergovernmental organization that is tasked with producing global environmental assessments (GEAs). These include the process of working through consensus to assess and summarize climate science and the need to include knowledge from as many of the 195 IPCC nation-states as possible, despite the structural inequalities between developed and developing countries. To highlight salient features that are unique to the IPCC but that offer lessons for other organizations that conduct GEAs, we include case studies on the politics of climate denialism, the use of geoengineering in mitigation scenarios, and the links between adaptive capacity, adaptation, and global development. We conclude with a discussion of institutional reflexivity. We consider how the IPCC can model an ethical and participatory response to climate change by critically examining, and being transparent about, the relation between science and politics.
AB - The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) conducts policy-relevant but not policy-prescriptive assessments of climate science. In this review, we engage with some of the key design features, achievements, and challenges that situate and characterize the IPCC as an intergovernmental organization that is tasked with producing global environmental assessments (GEAs). These include the process of working through consensus to assess and summarize climate science and the need to include knowledge from as many of the 195 IPCC nation-states as possible, despite the structural inequalities between developed and developing countries. To highlight salient features that are unique to the IPCC but that offer lessons for other organizations that conduct GEAs, we include case studies on the politics of climate denialism, the use of geoengineering in mitigation scenarios, and the links between adaptive capacity, adaptation, and global development. We conclude with a discussion of institutional reflexivity. We consider how the IPCC can model an ethical and participatory response to climate change by critically examining, and being transparent about, the relation between science and politics.
KW - Climate change
KW - Climate politics
KW - Global environmental assessment
KW - IPCC
KW - Reflexivity
KW - Transparency
KW - Uncertainty
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85031734519&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85031734519&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1146/annurev-environ-102016-061053
DO - 10.1146/annurev-environ-102016-061053
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85031734519
SN - 1543-5938
VL - 42
SP - 55
EP - 75
JO - Annual Review of Environment and Resources
JF - Annual Review of Environment and Resources
ER -