TY - JOUR
T1 - The Interplay of Top-down Institutional Pressures and Bottom-up Responses of Transition Economy Firms on FDI Entry Mode Choices
AU - Chung, Chris Changwha
AU - Xiao, Simon Shufeng
AU - Lee, Jeoung Yul
AU - Kang, Jingoo
N1 - Funding Information:
Profs. Chung and Kang acknowledge that the research is supported by the research fund at Korea University Business School. Prof. Xiao acknowledges that this work was supported by Hankuk University of Foreign Studies Research Fund.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2015, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
PY - 2016/10/1
Y1 - 2016/10/1
N2 - This study examines the role of institutions in explaining the FDI entry mode choices of transition economy firms. Advancing an institution-based view of international business strategy, the paper proposes a model of interactive institutional processes that incorporates both top-down institutional pressures and the bottom-up heterogeneous responses of individual firms to such pressures. The findings are based on a sample of 594 outward FDI entries made by Chinese firms. The results indicate that institutional pressures exerted by the home country government have a significant effect on outward FDI ownership decisions, such that firms facing greater institutional pressures are more inclined to choose outward international joint ventures (OIJVs) over wholly owned foreign subsidiaries. However, the effect of institutional government pressures on FDI entry mode choices is weaker for firms which are less dependent on the Chinese government for resources and thus enjoy more institutional freedom. Specifically, the ownership structures of Chinese firms moderate the positive effect of home country government pressures on the choice of OIJVs, such that the positive effect is weaker for modernized firms (i.e., newly created private and reformed incorporated firms) than conventional firms (i.e., state-owned enterprises (SOEs) and collectives). The positive effect is weaker for collectives than SOEs, while the positive effect is weaker for private firms than reformed firms (i.e., private firms < reformed firms < collectives < SOEs).
AB - This study examines the role of institutions in explaining the FDI entry mode choices of transition economy firms. Advancing an institution-based view of international business strategy, the paper proposes a model of interactive institutional processes that incorporates both top-down institutional pressures and the bottom-up heterogeneous responses of individual firms to such pressures. The findings are based on a sample of 594 outward FDI entries made by Chinese firms. The results indicate that institutional pressures exerted by the home country government have a significant effect on outward FDI ownership decisions, such that firms facing greater institutional pressures are more inclined to choose outward international joint ventures (OIJVs) over wholly owned foreign subsidiaries. However, the effect of institutional government pressures on FDI entry mode choices is weaker for firms which are less dependent on the Chinese government for resources and thus enjoy more institutional freedom. Specifically, the ownership structures of Chinese firms moderate the positive effect of home country government pressures on the choice of OIJVs, such that the positive effect is weaker for modernized firms (i.e., newly created private and reformed incorporated firms) than conventional firms (i.e., state-owned enterprises (SOEs) and collectives). The positive effect is weaker for collectives than SOEs, while the positive effect is weaker for private firms than reformed firms (i.e., private firms < reformed firms < collectives < SOEs).
KW - China
KW - Foreign direct investment
KW - Institutional freedom
KW - Institutional pressures
KW - Outward international joint ventures
KW - Transition economies
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84944707523&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84944707523&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11575-015-0256-5
DO - 10.1007/s11575-015-0256-5
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84944707523
SN - 0938-8249
VL - 56
SP - 699
EP - 732
JO - Management International Review
JF - Management International Review
IS - 5
ER -