Abstract
Leading advocates for microfinance have put forward an enticing 'win-win' proposition: microfinance institutions that follow the principles of good banking will also be those that alleviate the most poverty. This vision forms the core of widely-circulated 'best practices,' but as a general proposition the vision is fully supported neither by logic nor by the available empirical evidence. Recognizing the limits to the win-win proposition is an important step toward reaching a more constructive dialogue between microfinance advocates that privilege financial development and those that privilege social impacts. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 617-629 |
Number of pages | 13 |
Journal | World Development |
Volume | 28 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 2000 |
Keywords
- Bangladesh
- Credit
- Indonesia
- Microenterprise
- Poverty
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Geography, Planning and Development
- Development
- Sociology and Political Science
- Economics and Econometrics