TY - JOUR
T1 - The neural ingredients for a language of thought are available
AU - Kazanina, Nina
AU - Poeppel, David
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank Randy Gallistel, Norbert Hornstein, Bill Idsardi, Ellen Lau, Jake Quitly-Dunn, and Sandeep Prasada for valuable feedback and reviewer comments on the manuscript. We are also grateful for discussion to all participants of the 'Beyond Associations' workshop held in Frankfurt in October 2022, as well as to The Foundations Institute (www.tfi.ucsb.edu) and the Ernst Struengmann Institute for their support of the workshop. None declared by authors.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2023/11
Y1 - 2023/11
N2 - The classical notion of a ‘language of thought’ (LoT), advanced prominently by the philosopher Jerry Fodor, is an influential position in cognitive science whereby the mental representations underpinning thought are considered to be compositional and productive, enabling the construction of new complex thoughts from more primitive symbolic concepts. LoT theory has been challenged because a neural implementation has been deemed implausible. We disagree. Examples of critical computational ingredients needed for a neural implementation of a LoT have in fact been demonstrated, in particular in the hippocampal spatial navigation system of rodents. Here, we show that cell types found in spatial navigation (border cells, object cells, head-direction cells, etc.) provide key types of representation and computation required for the LoT, underscoring its neurobiological viability.
AB - The classical notion of a ‘language of thought’ (LoT), advanced prominently by the philosopher Jerry Fodor, is an influential position in cognitive science whereby the mental representations underpinning thought are considered to be compositional and productive, enabling the construction of new complex thoughts from more primitive symbolic concepts. LoT theory has been challenged because a neural implementation has been deemed implausible. We disagree. Examples of critical computational ingredients needed for a neural implementation of a LoT have in fact been demonstrated, in particular in the hippocampal spatial navigation system of rodents. Here, we show that cell types found in spatial navigation (border cells, object cells, head-direction cells, etc.) provide key types of representation and computation required for the LoT, underscoring its neurobiological viability.
KW - compositionality
KW - computational theory of mind
KW - language-of-thought
KW - spatial navigation
KW - symbolic representation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85168718107&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85168718107&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.tics.2023.07.012
DO - 10.1016/j.tics.2023.07.012
M3 - Review article
C2 - 37625973
AN - SCOPUS:85168718107
SN - 1364-6613
VL - 27
SP - 996
EP - 1007
JO - Trends in Cognitive Sciences
JF - Trends in Cognitive Sciences
IS - 11
ER -