The persistence of classes in post-industrial societies

Mike Hout, Clem Brooks, Jeff Manza

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Rout, Brooks and Manza attack the conclusion of Clark and Lipset (Reading 29) that social classes are dying and that the concept of social class has been rendered redundant by changes in the hierarchical nature of society. They complain that Clark and Lipset confuse social class with social status (hierarchy) and have produced an argument which is conceptually vague and misleading. As a result the reader is diverted from examining enduring inequalities by references to democratisation elsewhere in society. In this extract, Rout and colleagues examine the three ‘situses’ of politics, the economy and the family and, as a result, reject Clark and Lipset’s conclusion. They assert that despite change in advanced capitalist societies, class-based inequalities persist.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationClassic and Contemporary Readings in Sociology
PublisherTaylor and Francis
Pages175-183
Number of pages9
ISBN (Electronic)9781317882022
ISBN (Print)0582320232, 9780582320239
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The persistence of classes in post-industrial societies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Hout, M., Brooks, C., & Manza, J. (2014). The persistence of classes in post-industrial societies. In Classic and Contemporary Readings in Sociology (pp. 175-183). Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315840154-39