The Persuasive Power of Algorithmic and Crowdsourced Advice

Junius Gunaratne, Lior Zalmanson, Oded Nov

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


Prior research has shown that both advice generated through algorithms and advice resulting from averaging peers’ input can impact users’ decision-making. However, it is not clear which advice type is more closely followed and if changes in decision-making should be attributed to the source or the content of the advice. We examine the effects of algorithmic and social advice on decision-making in the context of an online retirement saving system. By varying both the advice’s message and the attributed messenger, we assess what it is about the advice that people follow. We find that both types of advice have a positive effect on users’ saving performance, and that users follow advice presented as coming from an algorithmic source more closely than advice presented as crowdsourced. Our results shed light on how people view and follow online advice, and on information systems’ persuasive effects under conditions of uncertainty.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1092-1120
Number of pages29
JournalJournal of Management Information Systems
Issue number4
StatePublished - Oct 2 2018


  • algorithmic advice
  • and phrases: online advice
  • crowdsourced advice
  • crowdsourcing
  • decision-making
  • investment advice
  • online persuasion
  • personal finance
  • retirement portfolios
  • uncertainty

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Management Information Systems
  • Computer Science Applications
  • Management Science and Operations Research
  • Information Systems and Management


Dive into the research topics of 'The Persuasive Power of Algorithmic and Crowdsourced Advice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this