This commentary on Eyal Rozmarin's paper To Be Is to Betray considers the place of history in the psychoanalytic encounter. Examining texts by Adorno and Ferenczi, the author cautions against radical cures that conflate political values with analytic ones.
|Original language||English (US)|
|Number of pages||5|
|State||Published - May 2011|
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Clinical Psychology