The regulation of explicit and implicit race bias: The role of motivations to respond without prejudice

Patricia G. Devine, E. Ashby Plant, David M. Amodio, Eddie Harmon-Jones, Stephanie L. Vance

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Three studies examined the moderating role of motivations to respond without prejudice (e.g., internal and external) in expressions of explicit and implicit race bias. In all studies, participants reported their explicit attitudes toward Blacks. Implicit measures consisted of a sequential priming task (Study 1) and the Implicit Association Test (Studies 2 and 3). Study 3 used a cognitive busyness manipulation to preclude effects of controlled processing on implicit responses. In each study, explicit race bias was moderated by internal motivation to respond without prejudice, whereas implicit race bias was moderated by the interaction of internal and external motivation to respond without prejudice. Specifically, high internal, low external participants exhibited lower levels of implicit race bias than did all other participants. Implications for the development of effective self-regulation of race bias are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)835-848
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of personality and social psychology
Volume82
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2002

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The regulation of explicit and implicit race bias: The role of motivations to respond without prejudice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this