The risk of sequelae due to pneumococcal meningitis in high-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Mark Jit

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the risk of various kinds of sequelae in survivors of meningitis due to Streptococcus pneumoniae, as well as the influence of co-factors such as study design, study population and treatment on this risk. Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were searched from 1 September 1991 to 18 June 2009 for original articles on pneumococcal meningitis sequelae. Prevalence of sequelae was pooled using random effects meta-analysis. Studies were appraised for the influence of referral bias, external validity of study populations, testing procedure and publication bias. Results: Data were extracted from 63 studies involving 3408 pneumococcal meningitis survivors. The pooled prevalence of any reported sequelae from 48 studies was 31.7% (95% confidence interval 27.2-36.3%) using a random effects model (Cochran-Q = 277, p < 0.01). Differences in studies due to design, study population and treatment were not significant. The pooled prevalence of hearing loss, seizures, hydrocephalus, spasticity/paresis, cranial nerve palsies and visual impairment was 20.9% (17.1-24.7%), 6.5% (3.3-9.7%), 6.8% (3.3-10.2%), 8.7% (6.4-11.0%), 12.2% (5.3-19.1%) and 2.4% (0-5.7%) respectively. Conclusions: The burden of sequelae due to pneumococcal meningitis remains high in the reviewed studies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)114-124
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Infection
Volume61
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2010

Keywords

  • Complications
  • Meningitis
  • Meningitis, bacterial
  • Meningitis, pneumococcal
  • Meta-analysis
  • Streptococcus pneumoniae

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Microbiology (medical)
  • Infectious Diseases

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The risk of sequelae due to pneumococcal meningitis in high-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this